A tar sands showdown in a small town in Maine, a battle to label genetically modified foods in Washington and a fracking fight in Colorado are some of the issues to watch on Election Day.
Common Dreams zooms in on six hotly-contested battles poised to set a course for progressive politics:
Washington State’s I-522 would require foods that have been genetically modified, or GMOs, to be labeled as such for retail purposes in the state.
Following legal pressure from anti-GMO campaign groups such as Moms for Labeling and Yes on 1-522 and the Washington State Attorney General’s office, the pro-GMO trade group Grocery Manufacturers Association was forced to release a list of its high rolling donors who have financed the NO on I- 522 drive.
As was expected, major food corporations and GMO users such as PepsiCo, Nestle USA, The Coca-Cola Co. and General Mills, among many others, had secretly donated millions of dollars to the GMA campaign.
GMA spending made up $7 million of the $17 million dollar No on I-522 push.
A similar initiative in California, Proposition 37, lost on last year’s ballot due to a similar flood of campaign money from pro-GMO food companies.
The following is the ballot text:
Initiative Measure No. 522 concerns labeling of genetically-engineered foods.
This measure would require most raw agricultural commodities, processed foods, and seeds and seed stocks, if produced using genetic engineering as defined, to be labeled as genetically engineered when offered for retail sale.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
Yes [ ]
Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks
No [ ]
Tar Sands Showdown in South Portland, Maine
Environmentalists are facing off with the tar sands industry in a hotly contested election in the coastal Maine town of South Portland. At issue is the Waterfront Protection Ordinance, a land-use zoning ordinance up for referendum Tuesday that would prevent oil industry efforts to build a massive tar sands export facility at the waterfront of this town of 25,000.
South Portland grassroots organizations are putting the ordinance to referendum in a proactive bid against industry plans to use a 70-year-old, 236-mile pipeline, currently employed to transport crude oil from freighters in the South Portland harbor to Montreal, to instead transport tar sands oil from Canada by reversing the flow of the pipeline. Under this industry scheme, tar sands oil would be distributed internationally by oil tankers and an ‘upgraded’ terminal in South Portland. The so-called upgrade would include two 70-foot smokestacks on the waterfront and storage tanks near local schools.
Big oil is throwing big money at the campaign, out-spending green groups six to one. “Oil industry spending is completely over the top,” said Robert Sellin, from the group Protect South Portland, in a previous interview with Common Dreams. “Clearly they have all the money. We are talking about some of the wealthiest corporations in the world. They do not want a community to stand up for itself.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT