It's Sen. Warren Vs. the Wells Fargo 'Weasels' Over Rescinding Executive Bonuses

A group of five Democratic U.S. senators has demanded to know whether Wells Fargo—recently slapped by regulators with a $185 million fine for creating millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts, racking up fees for consumers and bonuses for employees—intends on rescinding compensation to executives behind the “staggering fraud.”

In their letter (pdf) sent Thursday to Wells Fargo chairman and CEO John G. Stumpf, Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Sherrod Brown (Ohio), Jack Reed (R.I.), Robert Menendez (N.J.), and Jeff Merkley (Ore.), all members of the Republican-led Senate Banking Committee, ask whether the bank will invoke its clawback provision, “designed to prevent exactly what happened with Ms. Toldstedt: shareholders and consumers bearing the burden of bank misconduct while senior executives walk away with multi-million dollar awards based on what the company later finds out are fraudulent practices.”

That’s Carrie Tolstedt, the former senior executive vice president of community banking, the division that led the fraudulent incentive-compensation program.

The senators write that Tolstedt

Following her retirement announcement, Stumpf praised Tolstedt as “a standard-bearer of our culture” and “a champion for our customers.” CFPB head Richard Cordray, meanwhile, denounced the unit she led, saying it committed “unfair and abusive practices under federal law.”

The senators demand an answer about the clawback by Sept. 19, the day before Stumpf is scheduled to testify before the committee.


As the Huffington Post‘s Zach Carter writes Friday of the letter to Stumpf: “When Warren asks him to re-evaluate prior executive payouts, she’s asking him to consider ponying up part of his own fortune.”

Carter notes:

The senators “weren’t shy about its implications for his own bank account,” Carter writes.

Speaking last week about Wells Fargo to CNN, Sen. Warren said its behavior was “flatly wrong,” and said either the bank knew what was going on or it didn’t.

Click Here: cd universidad catolica

“It’s a bank, right? They’re supposed to keep track of people’s money, safety, security, and not know what more than 5,000 of your employees are doing? If they really didn’t know, then that tells me that this is a bank that is simply too big to manage.”

The senators’ letter comes as the House this week passed legislation described as “a gift to the Big Banks, that would extend their ‘license to steal’ and tear down hard-fought banking regulations, some of which have not yet been implemented.”

In his column Thursday entitled “Thanks, Wells Fargo, for Being Such a Bunch of Weasels,” the Los Angeles Times‘ David Lazarus wrote that the bank “has made a powerful case for why regulatory oversight is crucial and why the banking industry remains unworthy of the public’s trust.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Leave a Reply