De Blasio accuses Bennet of fearmongering on how to pay for 'Medicare for All'

New York Mayor Bill de BlasioBill de BlasioProtesters splash red paint on NYC streets to symbolize blood De Blasio: Robert E Lee’s ‘name should be taken off everything in America, period’ House Democratic whip pushes back on calls to defund police: We need to focus on reform MORE (D) criticized Sen. Michael BennetMichael Farrand BennetSome realistic solutions for income inequality Democratic senators kneel during moment of silence for George Floyd 21 senators urge Pentagon against military use to curb nationwide protests MORE (D-Colo.) during Wednesday’s Democratic presidential primary debate, accusing him of “fearmongering” when he talks about tax increases being needed to pay for “Medicare for All.”

“I don’t understand why Democrats on this stage are fearmongering about universal health care. It makes no sense,” de Blasio said. 

ADVERTISEMENT

He added that Americans are upset about how they are being treated by the pharmaceutical industry and private insurance companies, and said that Democrats should be the party that does something “bold.”

De Blasio said that Bennet is “absolutely inaccurate” when he talks about taxes needing to go up under a single-payer plan.

“Americans right now are paying so much money for their health care. Ask people about the reality of premiums, deductibles, copays, out of pocket expenses. That’s worse than any tax, and people are paying that right now,” de Blasio said.

Bennet responded that his criticisms of Medicare for All have nothing to do with Republican talking points or the pharmaceutical industry.

“This has to do with having faith in the American people that they can make the right decisions for their families and they can choose a public option,” Bennet said

The Colorado senator noted that Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.), a Democratic presidential candidate who has been a leader on Medicare for All, has said that he’d need to raise taxes to pay for it.

“He says that. Republicans don’t say it,” Bennet said. “Don’t try to distract from the truth.”

Sanders has floated a number of different ways to pay for Medicare for All, including a 4 percent, income-based premium on families making more than $29,000 per year, as well as a premium paid by employees, higher taxes on the wealthy and an expansion of the estate tax.

Click Here: cheap Cowboys jersey

John Lewis adds 30 new brands to ‘modernise’ AW20 offer

John Lewis has announced it’s added 30 new fashion, beauty and accessory
brands to its AW20 as it looks to “modernise” its offer.

Click Here: cheap sydney roosters jersey

The British retailer said it chose the brands to reflect an increasing
interest from customers in “more casual wardrobe choices”. The company has
also launched a new athleisure category as gyms reopen and the health and
wellbeing market continues to grow.

The new womenswear launches for AW20 are The Fold (July), Sosander
(August), Athleisure (August), Ganni footwear (August), Malone Souliers
(September), Fila trainers (September), Fat Face (September), Their Nibs
(October), and Celtic & Co (October).

Joining John Lewis’ menswear line-up are New Balance (July), Barbour
Wilderness Collection by Ben and Marina Fogle (September), and Dukes
Cupboard (October).

New beauty line launches are Beauty Tech (August), Olaplex (August), and
Kate Somerville (September).

Focus on ‘more casual wardrobe choices’

New Accessory launches are Longchamp launched online (July), Astrid &
Miyu (June), Goddess Charms (July), Togetherband (July), Wanderlust + Co
(July), and Dinny Hall (August).

Joining John Lewis’ sportswear line-up are Peloton (August), Apex Bikes
(September), and Arcteryx (October).

“As part of the work we’re doing to modernise John Lewis, we’re
introducing new brands that we feel really resonate with the needs of our
customers at this current time whether that’s comfortable, stylish
loungewear that’s smart enough for a Zoom call or skincare products that
enhance their natural complexion,” Christine Kasoulis, fashion director at
John Lewis, said in a statement.

“Our aim is to be the preferred fashion partner for brands. We’re proud
to be able to offer these fantastic brands a broader platform and network
that enables them to reach even more customers. These new brands are
designed to inspire and delight and will provide our own customer base with
even more beauty and fashion options to shop at John Lewis.”

Photo credit: John Lewis

Ethics complaint filed over de Blasio's use of NYC photo in 2020 ad

An ethics complaint was reportedly filed Thursday against New York City Mayor Bill de BlasioBill de BlasioProtesters splash red paint on NYC streets to symbolize blood De Blasio: Robert E Lee’s ‘name should be taken off everything in America, period’ House Democratic whip pushes back on calls to defund police: We need to focus on reform MORE (D) after he used an official city photo for his presidential campaign.

The photo, which was posted on de Blasio’s Instagram account — which he has used as a platform to promote his White House run — shows the mayor standing in front of a crowd at the 2017 Global Citizen Festival in Central Park, the New York Daily News reported.

The image was reportedly taken by the Mayoral Photography Office and appears to have since been deleted.

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

The complaint was filed with the city’s Conflicts of Interest Board and alleges that the mayor “is using a city paid for photo … in Paid for Sponsored ads on Instagram to fundraise for his Presidential campaign,” the Daily News reported.

ADVERTISEMENT

It wasn’t immediately clear who filed the complaint. The board’s assistant counsel, Chad Gholizadeh, told the Daily News that he couldn’t discuss information about specific complaints.

According to the city’s charter, public servants are barred from using “City letterhead, personnel, equipment, resources, or supplies for any non-City purpose” and can only use these resources if the Conflicts of Interest Board approves it.

Gholizadeh told the Daily News that public servants are able to use nonconfidential photos “or other non-confidential public documents produced by the City for a private purpose so long as that public servant obtains those City photographs or documents through the same process as any member of the public.”

In a statement to The Hill, de Blasio’s national press secretary Jaclyn Rothenberg maintained that “city photos are public and allowed to be used.”

“City photos are made available to the general public through the Mayor’s Flickr account, and therefore can be accessed by political campaigns on the same terms as the general public,” she said.

Some of de Blasio’s previous ads have reportedly included footage from taxpayer-funded videos of his public events, according to the Daily News.

Buttigieg: 'Systemic racism is a white problem'

Presidential candidate Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegScaled-back Pride Month poses challenges for fundraising, outreach Biden hopes to pick VP by Aug. 1 It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process MORE (D) said Thursday that “systemic racism” in the U.S. “is a white problem,” following a mass shooting over the weekend that authorities said involved a suspect believed to be a white supremacist. 

Speaking at the National Association of Black Journalists conference in Miami, the South Bend, Ind., mayor said the U.S. was “by no means even halfway done dealing with systemic racism in this country.”

“I hope over the course of this campaign, you will see how I speak about these issues — not only with mostly black audiences, but with mostly white audiences,” Buttigieg continued. “Because if there’s anything we’ve learned in the last few days, systemic racism is a white problem.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Buttigieg’s remarks come as President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE faces scrutiny for his rhetoric following two mass shootings over the weekend that left at least 31 dead and dozens other wounded. 

Trump on Wednesday defended himself against accusations that his immigration rhetoric inspired the suspected El Paso, Texas, shooter, who shot and killed 22 people after allegedly posting a manifesto warning of a “Hispanic invasion.”

But Buttigieg said Thursday that issues involving race and gun violence surpassed the Trump administration.

Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey

“I think a president like this one is not even possible unless something is already deeply wrong in our country. And I think the story — the story in my region, and the story for my generation — reflects those deeper problems growing up in an era of endless war and school shootings,” he said.

The South Bend mayor has struggled to gain support among black voters since he entered the race. A CNN poll last month showed Buttigieg polling at zero percent among black voters nationally.

He has begun speaking more frequently about race and inequality in recent weeks, especially after the fatal shooting of Eric Logan, a 54-year-old black man, by a white South Bend police officer. Last month, Buttigieg unveiled his “Douglass Plan” — named after the iconic 19th century black leader Frederick Douglass — which aims to alleviate the effects of systemic racism.

Obama has taken active interest in Biden's campaign: report

Former President Obama has taken an active interest in Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE’s presidential campaign, even holding a lunch with his former vice president last month, according to a report in The New York Times.

Obama also summoned top members of Biden’s campaign to his Washington, D.C., home earlier this year for a briefing on Biden’s communications and digital media strategies ahead of the former vice president’s campaign launch.

Obama is not endorsing a candidate in the Democratic presidential primary, where polls show Biden is the front-runner.

ADVERTISEMENT

He has pledged to stay neutral in the race and has made few forays into political life. An exception came last month when Obama warned against political leaders who give support to white supremacy and white nationalists, remarks that came after a deadly shooting in El Paso, Texas. The suspect in that shooting allegedly targeted Hispanics.

But the Times report states that Obama is watching Biden’s campaign closely and has offered advice at different times.

The former president has reportedly urged Biden’s campaign to include younger advisers, and the Times reported that Obama is frustrated with some of Biden’s closest advisers, who he perceives as out of touch with the younger activist base of the Democratic Party.

Obama asked two Biden aides — spokeswoman Kate Bedingfield and former White House communications adviser Anita Dunn — to visit with him in March for a briefing on its strategy. Afterwards, the Times reported that Obama told the aides they should make sure that Biden does not “embarrass himself” or “damage his legacy” while running for president.

Click Here: brisbane lions guernsey 2019

Biden has tied himself closely to Obama in his campaign, and his popularity, particularly with African American voters, has been largely attributed to his years in the Obama White House. 

In a Fox News poll published Thursday, Biden held first place overall with 31 percent of the vote compared to his closest competitor, Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Joint Chiefs chairman says he regrets participating in Trump photo-op | GOP senators back Joint Chiefs chairman who voiced regret over Trump photo-op | Senate panel approves 0B defense policy bill Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names MORE (D-Mass.), who has moved into second place at 20 percent.

Five things to know about David Koch

Click:400G QSFP-DD AOC

David Koch, the billionaire industrialist and conservative political benefactor, died Friday at the age of 79.

In the 1960s, Koch took over Koch Industries alongside his brother, Charles Koch, from their father Fred Koch. The company, which funds petroleum, oil pipelines and a wide range of other chemical and consumer goods, is the now the nation’s second-largest private conglomerate, with an annual revenue of more than $100 billion, according to The New York Times.

But the brothers are best known for their polarizing influence over American politics. For decades, the two funded Republican and Libertarian political campaigns at the state and national levels with their wide-ranging network of organizations and political action committees that promote small government, anti-regulatory values across the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s something I grew up with,” Koch told Brian Doherty, editor of the libertarian magazine Reason, in 2005, “a fundamental point of view that big government was bad, and imposition of government controls on our lives and economic fortunes was not good.”

Here are five things you need to know about David Koch.

Spent billions on political causes

Koch and his brother have spent billions influencing conservative American politics through more than a dozen groups that they either founded or that received millions from them; the groups became known as the Koch network.

In the 2016 election cycle alone, the Koch network spent nearly $900 million, almost matching what the entire Republican Party spent on candidates that year, according to The Washington Post.

The Koch network also announced that it planned to spend up to $400 million during the 2018 election cycle. It launched four new political action committees for the 2020 election, but Americans for Prosperity, a central wing of the Koch network, said it does not plan to be directly involved in the 2020 presidential race.

The brothers also spent millions outside of political campaigns, attacking specific Democratic and progressive policies. For example, the network spent more than $200 million to try to defeat ObamaCare between 2010 and 2012, according to The Washington Post.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Koch network lent a hand to a vast swath of influential voices in Washington, including major political figures ranging from Sen. Joni ErnstJoni Kay ErnstGeorge Conway group hits Ernst in new ad GOP senators introduce resolution opposing calls to defund the police The Hill’s Campaign Report: Republicans go on attack over calls to ‘defund the police’ MORE (R-Iowa), to Vice President Mike PenceMichael (Mike) Richard PencePence posts, deletes photo of Trump campaign staff without face masks, not social distancing Pence threatens to deploy military if Pennsylvania governor doesn’t quell looting Pence on Floyd: ‘No tolerance for racism’ in US MORE’s gubernatorial election in Indiana to Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoPompeo: US response to Floyd protests a ‘stark contrast’ to authoritarian regimes Trump administration accuses international court of corruption at ‘highest levels,’ authorizes sanctions A crisis on the Korean peninsula reinforces the need for allies MORE’s time in Congress, during which he was known as the “congressman from Koch,” the Post reported.

Had a fraught relationship with Trump

Koch and his brother opposed President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE’s campaign in 2016 and did not endorse him, after Trump accused his fellow GOP contenders who sought Koch money of being “puppets.”

Koch attended Trump’s victory party after the 2016 presidential election, and he later met with Trump when he was the president-elect at his Mar-a-Lago resort, according to The New York Times. But, the Koch organization opposed the Trump administration’s policies on top spending-related agenda items as well as Trump’s rhetoric on immigration.

However, the brothers departed from Trump most significantly on trade issues. The two were staunch free-trade advocates, and Charles Koch called Trump’s support of tariffs and other protectionist trade policies “detrimental” to the country.

The Koch network groups, such as Freedom Partners, Americans for Prosperity and the LIBRE Initiative, launched a multimillion-dollar, multiyear program to oppose Trump’s tariffs last year, including lobbying lawmakers, training activists and taking out political ads against the policy.

Trump publicly lashed out at the brothers on Twitter last year, calling them “globalists” and “a total joke in real Republican circles.”

Was a libertarian who — mainly — backed Republican voices 

In 1980, Koch served as the Libertarian Party’s nominee for vice president on a ticket with Ed Clark, a corporate lawyer.

The duo’s platform called for an end to all corporate and personal income taxes, abolishing Medicare and repealing child labor laws. The pair received only 1 percent of the popular vote against President Reagan’s presidential ticket, but the experience solidified Koch’s commitment to libertarian policy priorities for the country.

Therefore, although Koch was aligned with most Republicans on issues of trade, taxes, deregulation and campaign finance reform, he told ABC News that he identified as a “social liberal.”

Koch supported LGBTQ marriage and reproductive rights for women seeking abortions, as well as other Democratic policy priorities like withdrawing troops from the Middle East and cutting defense spending as a method of balancing the budget.

But, the Koch brothers poured millions into think tanks, lobbying and other groups to stop mobilization around climate change and environmental research and legislation, as well as public transit initiatives.

ADVERTISEMENT

Greenpeace accused Koch Industries of being the “kingpin of climate science denial.”

Funded the Tea Party’s rise

Koch can be uniquely credited with helping fund the rise of the Tea Party beginning in 2008 to oppose the Obama administration. Americans for Prosperity funded and inspired Tea Party leaders through campaign contributions, talking points and mobilization efforts.

The group held summits and organized events to raise the “voices of average Americans” that were “drowned out by lobbyists and special interests,” Jane Mayer reported in her 2010 analysis in The New Yorker of the group’s influence, titled “Covert Operations.”

It also gave at least $100 million to Tea Party efforts that tried to move the country to the right, according to The New York Times.

Nevertheless, Koch told New York magazine in 2010 that he had never given money to any Tea Party candidate.

“I’ve never been to a Tea Party event,” Koch said. “No one representing the Tea Party has ever even approached me.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Became a Democratic boogey man

The term “the Koch brothers” has become synonymous with far-right policy priorities for many Democrats, especially on the issues of campaign finance deregulation and the influence of the superwealthy in American politics.

President Obama reserved his first broadcast television campaign ad during the 2012 presidential election to take on the Koch brothers. The ad did not mention them by name, but it told Americans in swing states like Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia that “secretive oil billionaires [are] attacking President Obama with ads fact-checkers say are not tethered to the facts,” The New York Times reported.

After Koch’s death was announced, some took to Twitter to condemn the swath of ways he influenced American politics over his lengthy career.

Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019

McLaren to pay tribute to veteran team member at Monza

McLaren’s cars will carry a special tribute at Monza where the team will celebrate veteran mechanic Ray Rowe who will retire from McLaren after 55 years with the papaya squad.

Rowe, who worked for Cooper in F1 in the early sixties, was one of the first employees recruited by Bruce McLaren in 1965.

Through the decades, through thick and thin, ‘Tex’ as he is fondly known remained loyal to McLaren, surviving the change of ownership in the early eighties when Ron Dennis took over the team’s operations.

©McLaren

While he’s no longer a member of the travelling squad, Rowe still clocks in at Woking where he works part-time in McLaren’s transmission department.

“We’ll carry a special tribute on the car this weekend to Ray Rowe, who is set to retire from the team after an incredible 55 years of service,” said McLaren F1 boss Andreas Seidl.

“Tex joined with Bruce in 1965 and has worked in a variety of roles, including helping Bruce prepare for our first Grand Prix in 1966. We wish Tex a happy and healthy retirement.”

Monza follows Spa as a high speed, low-downforce venue, and Seidl says McLaren will need to be at the top of its game to solidify its third-place position in the Constructors’ standings.

    Button: Ricciardo move to McLaren ‘make or break’

“The unique high-speed Monza circuit, will make it necessary to bring a low-downforce package again,” explained Seidl.

“It’s up to us in the race team to extract the maximum performance from the car in what will be a tight battle for strong points finishes.

“The intensity in the midfield is keeping us sharply focused on the task at hand.

“We’re aware that one bad race can drop a team from third in the Constructors’ Championship to sixth, so our strategy, operations and performance need to be at consistently high levels.

“With the narrow performance gap between four or five teams, we should be in for an exciting and enjoyable race.”

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina

Diesel partners with GR8

Diesel has introduced a new collaboration with GR8, the Harajuku,
Tokyo-based concept store for contemporary fashion and streetwear. The
partnership will link Diesel with eight of the most forward-thinking
Japanese and international designers and artists in unique and
limited-edition capsule collections, representing the creative force and
idea from each one of them, in powerful graphics and prints applied into
Diesel apparel, all curated by GR8’s owner, Kubo.

The idea for this collaboration began when Diesel founder Renzo Rosso, in
one of his frequent visits to Japan, attended a party in Tokyo where he met
Kubo, who also serves as GR8’s head buyer. The two hit it off, discussing
the uniqueness of Tokyo’s creative circles and the eccentric vibrance of
its social scene. From the singular brands and products stocked at GR8 to
niche and under-the-radar regional fashion labels they’d both been
impressed by, the two had much to talk about.

Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina

“At this party I was inspired by the gathering of artists and designers,”
Kubo said. “There was this strong connection. It was like a ‘grown up
playground.’ Renzo and I have spoken about this inkling idea for over a
year, and now, this capsule collection is created with Diesel’s love,
spirit and power.”

“I have always been drawn to Tokyo and this will never change, even though
the city is always changing,” said Russo. “This new initiative between
Diesel and GR8, and Kubo’s network, shows a very modern and innovative way
to ‘collaborate,’ which is a word that is now ubiquitous in fashion. When
you collaborate on a niche scale, it makes the product much more rare.”

The overall capsules are based on Diesel denim, jackets, sweats, and
t-shirts. All are approached from a unisex perspective. Each of the eight
designers and artists have given these pieces their own unique expression.
Their artistic mediums range widely including photography, illustration,
calligraphy and typography.

A total of 36 items will be available. The visual catchiness ultimately
recalls Kubo’s original idea of a “playground” executed in an impactful
pop-up concept design.

These eight special capsules were created as a trifecta collaboration
between Diesel, GR8 and each respective creative party. The collection will
launch this Friday and will only be available only at major Japanese Diesel
stores, diesel.co.jp, the GR8 Harajuku store, and GR8’s website.

photos: courtesy of Diesel

US gas exporters fear EU retaliation over Trump sanctions

Construction of the Eugal gas pipeline near Ludwigsburg, Germany; it will connect with the Nord Stream 2 pipeline | Sean Gallup/Getty Images

US gas exporters fear EU retaliation over Trump sanctions

‘This is not a way you treat allies and friends,’ a German lawmaker warns about US sanctions against the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

By

Updated

The Trump administration’s escalating sanctions threats against Europe over Russian gas ties are threatening to blow back against U.S. energy companies.

The White House and congressional Republicans have been aiming increasing amounts of sanctions legislation at companies in Germany and other European Union countries — including threats from Senator Ted Cruz against the publicly owned German port of Mukran, a staging area for ships finishing the Russia-backed Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.

But now there’s growing worry that the EU will retaliate against what it considers illegal U.S. extraterritorial sanctions that undermine its sovereignty.

“This is not a way you treat allies and friends. Now, the European Union should show unequivocally that it will not be blackmailed,” said Klaus Ernst, chairman of the German parliament’s energy and economic affairs committee. “If diplomacy fails, we’ll need penalty tariffs on fracking gas or even an import ban as a painful countersanction, since the U.S. gas industry seems to be a major driver of the sanctions policy.”

That’s a big potential problem for American liquefied natural gas (LNG) suppliers in Texas, Pennsylvania and elsewhere, who see Europe as a major market.

Last year, U.S. LNG made up just 3.5 percent of EU gas consumption, but the bloc’s declining domestic production — and emphasis on natural gas as a cleaner-burning fuel in the transition from coal to renewables — provides a market opening in the coming decades.

But rather than boost American gas, U.S. threats of “crushing” financial penalties over Nord Stream 2 could backfire.

Kevin Book, managing director of energy think tank ClearView and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the U.S. National Petroleum Council, said the latest threats against the pipeline have touched a particular nerve.

“Telling Europe they can’t buy Iranian oil was an affront, but Europe took it because they had to,” Book said. “But telling Germany it can’t buy Russian gas when they’re already connected and buying Russian gas goes a bit further in their eyes. They see it as their sovereign right to buy whatever molecules they want to buy … Germany looks at this and says, ‘You’re going to sanction us? Well, we’ve got economic tools too.’”

Weaponizing green regulation?

Book said that one way the EU could make life difficult for U.S. LNG suppliers would be to impose a tax based on the carbon emissions associated with imported products.

That could raise the cost of natural gas from West Texas, where venting and flaring of gas is still a huge problem, and favor direct gas pipelines into Europe, which cut out the greenhouse gas emissions associated with shipping LNG in tankers.

The EU is also considering adopting tough methane emission standards for oil, coal and gas that could be costly for global suppliers.

An August draft of the EU’s upcoming methane strategy obtained by POLITICO says that “the EU will consider enforcing an effective stop of all routine venting and flaring in the EU energy sector by 2025” and reach out to international suppliers to encourage alignment to its stricter standards. A final document is expected later this year.

As natural gas becomes a tool in the geopolitical tug-of-war between the United States and Russia, more European countries are looking to still-nascent hydrogen fuel technology as an escape hatch, said Nick Tsafos, senior fellow with the Energy Security and Climate Change Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“If you’re standing in Europe and looking at gas and LNG, it’s political,” Tsafos said. “On one hand it’s Russia and the U.S. squeezing. Then there’s the question of methane. It’s a headache. Some countries want to get out of gas as quickly as possible and move more toward hydrogen.”

In July, the EU released a hydrogen strategy envisioning the futuristic fuel gradually supplanting natural gas — with the transactions being denominated in euros, not dollars, something that could blunt the effect of U.S. sanctions.

Sanctions tit-for-tat?

For now, the pressure from Washington is growing.

A State Department spokesperson said the Trump administration has given Europe ample time to disentangle itself from businesses that could run afoul of sanctions. They pointed to a July 15 press conference where Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters that changes to U.S. sanctions guidance “puts investments or other activities that are related to Nord Stream 2 at risk of U.S. sanctions.”

“It’s a clear warning to companies that aiding and abetting Russia’s malign influence projects will not be tolerated,” Pompeo said at the time. “Get out now, or risk the consequences.”

But the fact that the State Department issued a warning doesn’t change that going after European companies is a serious upending of previous norms when it comes to a region that had been considered an important ally, said a senior executive at one U.S. LNG company.

“This had previously been a red line,” the executive said of sanctions sweeping up European companies. “It absolutely does increase tensions, primarily between the United States and Germany, but also the U.S. and EU writ large.”

At an August 12 diplomatic meeting between the State Department and 24 EU member countries, Bureau of Energy Resources Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Diplomacy Kurt Donnelly noted that Nord Stream 2 sanctions would be “a difficult policy for the U.S. to implement and that there is a clear preference not to use sanctions,” according to minutes seen by POLITICO.

Nonetheless, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Alexander Alden said the recent moves enjoy overwhelming bipartisan support among U.S. lawmakers and that “these types of targeted sanctions will remain in place until there is a desired change in policy” on the part of malign actors.

For its part, the European Commission has said it is preparing a “reinforced sanctions mechanism next year to ensure that Europe is more resilient to extraterritorial sanctions by third countries and that sanctions imposed by the EU are properly enforced.”

Some countries are looking to get out of the U.S. financial system altogether to avoid sanctions.

Luisa Santos, deputy director general of the BusinessEurope lobby and a member of the European Commission’s expert group on EU trade agreements, pointed to increased interest in INSTEX, the special purpose payment system created in January 2019 by France, Germany and the U.K. designed to allow “lawful trade” with Iran by circumventing the vast U.S financial system.

Belgium, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden joined the platform, and in March the first transaction on it took place, sending medical supplies to Iran.

But the priority, Santos said, is to return to friendly trade relations.

“The U.S. is not our enemy, we should not be focusing all our attention on trying to find ways to shield European companies from U.S. sanctions — we are being forced to talk about this,” she said.

Want more analysis from POLITICO? POLITICO Pro is our premium intelligence service for professionals. From financial services to trade, technology, cybersecurity and more, Pro delivers real-time intelligence, deep insight and breaking scoops you need to keep one step ahead. Email [email protected] to request a complimentary trial.

Authors:
Ben Lefebvre 

and

America Hernandez 

California Republican ousted in 2018 announces rematch for House seat

Click:electrictronic parts

Former Rep. David ValadaoDavid Goncalves ValadaoDemocratic Rep. Cox advances in California primary The 14 other key races to watch on Super Tuesday The biggest political upsets of the decade MORE (R-Calif.), who lost his seat in the 2018 blue wave, announced Wednesday he will run for the House again in California’s 21st District.

“The Central Valley needs a strong voice they can trust representing them in Congress — someone who listens and understands that Central Valley residents just want an opportunity to provide and build a better life for their families. That’s why I’m running to represent California’s 21st District,” he wrote on his Facebook page.

“I can make a difference for the Central Valley, and I will work day in and day out for the honor and privilege of serving this community.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Valadao’s announcement sets up a much-anticipated rematch for one of last year’s tightest midterm races.

The California Republican held a 4,400-vote lead immediately after polling closed in November and was initially declared the victor, but a batch of outstanding provisional and mail-in ballots ultimately handed Democrat TJ Cox the seat.

House Democrats’ campaign arm, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), hammered Valadao after his announcement Wednesday, seeking to tie the former three-term lawmaker to President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE in a district that is majority Hispanic.

“In 2018, #CA21 voters rightly threw @dgvaladao out of office. Valadao’s a career politician who sided with President Trump 98% of the time,” the DCCC tweeted.

“Now FAILED Rep. @dgvaladao has announced he will run again in #CA21. Clearly Valadao didn’t get the message last time. But maybe he’ll learn this time when Central Valley voters again reject the morally bankrupt Trump-Valadao agenda in 2020.”

The GOP is hoping to regain ground in the House next year after the party was widely rebuked in suburban districts like the one in California last year.

Republicans are working to cast Democratic opponents as “socialists” in the hopes that the moniker will turn off moderate or independent voters.

“TJ Cox is a corrupt businessman who has already proven he is unfit to serve in Congress,” National Republican Congressional Committee spokeswoman Torunn Sinclair said in a statement. “Cox wants to take even more money out of your pocket to fund his socialist agenda. He is wrong for the Central Valley and wrong for America.” 

The Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan election handicapper, rates California’s 21st District as “Lean Democratic” in the 2020 cycle.