Do consumers really favour clothing made ‘at home’?

Consumer markets are increasingly global, yet consumers continue to say
they favor products made “at home.” Or at least that’s what they say. But
when it comes to actual purchase decisions, this sentiment gives way to
more important considerations: brand value, price, quality, features,
convenience, and performance.

Local preferences clearly matter in food, where consumers equate “local”
with “fresh” and have strong national and regional tastes. This keeps the
industry’s footprint highly local. But in apparel, consumers focus on
performance, innovation, style, and brand reputation, no matter what the
source.

For products where the perception of value is very deeply associated with
the country of origin, like Italian tailoring, Swiss watches or American
sportswear, consumers remain faithful even after much of the content is no
longer sourced in the country of association. Nike, for example, doesn’t
make its sneakers in the US, but consumer perception does not equate it
with India, where it makes much of its products. Nor is the consumer
particularly bothered that Nike doesn’t produce in the US.

What are the implications for companies? Manufacturers that do make
garments in desirable regions and markets can employ the power of country
of origin to cultivate and strengthen their brand identity, even when
products are not strictly domestic.

We see companies such as Chanel, Victorinox (Swiss Army) and Hermès using
country of association to convey brand images of quality, precision,
performance, or luxury. We also see companies successfully creating country
associations wherever they manufacture.

Manufacturers should identify where they can create positive associations
(e.g., in design or in craftsmanship or quality) with countries of origin
and use those insights to differentiate their products.
Click Here: IQOS White

Leave a Reply