Poll: Two-thirds of voters oppose impeachment proceedings

Nearly two out of three voters say Democrats should not initiate impeachment proceedings against President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE and a majority say it’s time to turn the page on the Russia investigation, according to a new poll.

The latest Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll survey found that 65 percent of respondents oppose impeachment proceedings. A majority of Democrats polled, 56 percent, support impeachment, however, only 32 percent of independents and 14 percent of Republicans are in favor.

A majority of respondents, 58 percent, said it’s time to turn the page on the Russia investigations, including 60 percent of independents, although two-thirds of Democrats want to see further investigations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Impeachment ranks fourth on the list of priorities voters have for the Democratic-controlled House, behind addressing the status of immigrants in the country illegally, stimulating the economy and strengthening ObamaCare.

“It seems that impeachment is over as a real threat to the Trump presidency though the base of the Democratic Party remains energized on the issue,” said Harvard CAPS/Harris polling director Mark PennMark PennThe Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden leads Trump by 6 points in new poll Biden leads Trump by 6 points as voters sour on pandemic response: poll Poll: Two-thirds of voters say the economy is on the wrong track MORE. “Overall though, the voters want Democrats to get back to issues over investigations and they may pay a price for not listening to them.”

The poll findings also illustrate how the country remains deeply divided on special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerCNN’s Toobin warns McCabe is in ‘perilous condition’ with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill’s 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE’s report into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Mueller did not establish any criminal conspiracy between Trump campaign officials and Russia, and he also did not offer a determination on obstruction of justice in the report.

Forty-five percent of voters in the poll released Friday said they agree with the finding that there is no evidence of collusion, while 35 percent said they believe Mueller did find evidence on the collusion front.

On the question of obstruction of justice, 41 percent believe Mueller found evidence and 41 percent said he didn’t. Respondents cut largely along partisan lines, with 41 percent of independents saying there was no obstruction and 37 percent saying there was.

Overall, about three-quarters of respondents, 76 percent, said Mueller’s finding did not change their opinion on the Russia investigation.

The poll also found some support for a review into the origins of the FBI’s probe into the Trump campaign, something allies of Trump have advocated for in recent weeks.

Sixty-four percent of voters said Democrats should accept Mueller’s findings and move on without launching any new Russia probes, though 61 percent said they support a special counsel being appointed to investigate the origins of the FBI’s probe into the Trump campaign. Fifty-five percent said they believe bias played a role in the FBI launching its investigation into contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

Congressional Democrats, who maintain oversight power in the House, have largely turned their focus to investigating Trump’s personal business empire.

Fifty-five percent of voters said congressional subpoenas for Trump’s bank records are an appropriate part of the oversight function. Forty-one percent said Democrats are overreaching in their investigations of Trump, while 29 percent said they were doing too little and another 29 percent said the level of investigations is just right.

The Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll online survey of 1,536 registered voters was conducted from April 30 to May 1. The sample size is made up of 37 percent Democrats, 32 percent Republicans and 29 percent independents.

Click Here: Bape Kid 1st Camo Ape Head rompers

The Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll is a collaboration of the Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University and The Harris Poll. The Hill will be working with Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll throughout 2019.

Full poll results will be posted online later today. The Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll survey is an online sample drawn from the Harris Panel and weighted to reflect known demographics. As a representative online sample, it does not report a probability confidence interval.

De Blasio blasts Trump as he launches 2020 bid: 'Every New Yorker knows he's a con artist'

New York City Mayor Bill de BlasioBill de BlasioProtesters splash red paint on NYC streets to symbolize blood De Blasio: Robert E Lee’s ‘name should be taken off everything in America, period’ House Democratic whip pushes back on calls to defund police: We need to focus on reform MORE blasted President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE on Thursday hours after launching his 2020 Democratic presidential campaign, saying “every New Yorker knows he’s a con artist.”

“Right now, the federal government is not on the side of working people. And that’s because Donald Trump is playing a big con on America,” de Blasio said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“I call him Con Don. Every New Yorker knows he’s a con artist. We know his tricks. We know his playbook,” de Blasio continued. “I know how to take him on — I’ve been watching him for decades. He’s trying to convince working Americans he’s on their side. It’s been a lie from day one.”

“Donald Trump must be stopped,” de Blasio said in a video announcing his White House bid earlier Thursday morning. “I’ve beaten him before and I’ll do it again.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump, meanwhile, called de Blasio a “JOKE” in a tweet after the mayor announced his presidential candidacy, adding that Democrats are “getting another beauty” in the 2020 field.

De Blasio is a frequent critic of Trump, a New York business mogul, and held a news conference in Trump Tower on Monday to promote new regulations curbing energy use by buildings in the city.

The mayor said the Trump Organization could face fines of around $2 million per year starting in 2030 if its buildings do not reduce their carbon emissions.

ADVERTISEMENT

He was heckled by Trump supporters during his appearance and then engaged in a heated exchange over Twitter with Eric TrumpEric Frederick TrumpLara Trump: Twitter no longer ‘a platform for free speech’ Trump DC hotel did not request rent relief from GSA The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – Mnuchin, Powell: Economy may need more boost; Trump defends malaria drug MORE, the president’s son.

De Blasio became the 24th candidate to jump into the already-crowded field of Democratic contenders, vowing to take on the wealthy and big corporations. 

“There’s plenty of money in this world, there’s plenty of money in this country, it’s just in the wrong hands,” he said in his campaign video.

A Quinnipiac poll from early April found that 73 percent of New York City voters said de Blasio should not run for president, compared to 18 percent who said he should.

“Good Morning America” host George StephanopoulosGeorge Robert StephanopoulosPelosi: Presidents should not ‘fuel the flame’ National security adviser defends Trump tweets: The president ‘wants to de-escalate violence’ Sanders pushes back on doubts supporters will back Biden MORE questioned de Blasio on Thursday for joining the race.

“What should the rest of the country think when so many of your fellow New Yorkers are saying ‘don’t run’?” Stephanopoulos asked.

De Blasio pointed to his reelection numbers, saying “the poll that actually matters is the election.”

“New Yorkers have twice said that they wanted me to lead them,” de Blasio said. “And I think about polling, in general, it’s not where you start, it’s where you end.”

Click Here: cheap Cowboys jersey

Black Lives Matter in fashion school, a case study

Click:Tea pouch packing machine

The nation’s institutions spent the summer urgently examining
recruitment practices, policy and syllabus creation as a direct result of
this spring’s Black Lives Matter reckoning. In June, on what became known
as Blackout Tuesday, when schools posted a black square on their social
media pages to denounce racism, the pushback was swift. Alumni took to
comments sections to level accusations of hypocrisy and performative
allyship at their alma maters. The debacle forced schools to literally
course-correct.

A relatively new program, the Masters of Professional Studies in Fashion
Management at Parsons School of Design, generously allowed FashionUnited to
see how it is navigating this historic moment. It exists as a microcosm of
what is happening among faculty and in institutions across the US and
overseas. Program director, Keanan Duffty, believes the only way to
confront systemic racism in this time of unlearning, as the
process of identifying and extracting the nuanced layers of white supremacy
has become known, is with transparency and objectivity. He facilitated
interviews with his colleagues and with students who recently graduated
from the program who identify as Black/African American/POC to give their
perspective of the learning experience and culture.

“We have no desire to uphold old systems that marginalize anyone,” says
core faculty member, Christopher Lacy, who helped Duffty build the program
for its 2018 launch. “We do have every desire to create a space where it
is absolutely appropriate and preferred to question and challenge those
systems and ultimately through collaboration develop solutions.” In the
first week, students receive what he calls a “crash course” in inclusivity,
diving into the importance of black culture in fashion as well as issues of
ageism, non-binary concerns, and those with disabilities. “I think, amongst
the three of us, because we came from industry we knew what we wanted this
to be,” he says, “we knew what types of leaders we wanted to emerge from
this program.”

Racism has been embedded in American education

Recent graduate, Jeffrey Drouillard, is one of those leaders. While he
didn’t witness or experience acts of racism while studying on the program,
he believes the issue is more deep-rooted. “I’ve witnessed it through the
curriculum,” he says, of the systemic racism that is embedded in the
American education system. Drouillard says the teaching he received came
from a basis of white supremacy. “The white textbook with information which
oftentimes leaves out parts of history, particularly the parts where people
of color have influenced or were of impact. It’s essentially erasing the
realities of colonialism and slavery. Imagine going to school and those who
are ‘successful’ don’t look like you and you’re constantly being
underrepresented.” He notes the absence in the Eurocentric fashion
education space of any reference to Black creatives, innovators such as
Zelda Wynn Valdes, Jay Jaxon, Willi Smith, and Ann Lowe––a shockingly
overlooked designer considering she was the creator of the wedding dress
for the American style icon of the twentieth century perhaps more revered
than any other, Jacqueline Kennedy. While Drouillard appreciates the
industry’s attempts to right its wrongs with regards to factory conditions
or child labor, it is overlooking a major opportunity: “To educate on human
rights by speaking to how the American textile supply was fully built on
free slave labor.”

Graduate Jessica Jones credits the MPS program for delivering on its
promise of “equal opportunity and the pursuit of creating change agents.”
While she identified this on Day 1, she was particularly cognizant of it
during the eventful spring semester: “In light of the recent protests due
to racism and police brutality, my professors for one of the courses at the
time decided to pivot the original curriculum and adjust accordingly so
that students could learn and critically think about what can be done
personally and professionally to help combat racism.”

Of course, the experience of students of color from diverse ethnicities
can vary greatly within the same classroom, but it can be especially
different for international students. They might be encountering racism, or
at least the magnified discussion of it, for the first time. “As an Indian
student coming to the United States to study at Parsons, I was very
thrilled on the very first day to see the cultural mix at The New School,
as well as in my program,” says Prachi Gor. “In the past year, it has been
quite a journey. Outside of school, I’ve dealt with and adapted, with some
difficulty, to new cultures and ways of being. However, inside school I
felt I could be myself.” Gor believes this is what all schools should
currently be striving for, to create a safe environment for incoming
students from anywhere in the world, and to be upfront about addressing
historical and institutional failings as well outlining steps towards
actionable change. In her cohort which had an enrollment of 50%
international students, the freedom to have difficult conversations and to
be met with consideration and respect was an important aspect of her
studying experience in a diverse capital like New York City. The program’s
decision to adapt the syllabus to accommodate the real-time issues of the
protests was also a pivotal educational moment for Gor. “It made me very
aware of issues that I probably didn’t notice, realize, or understand
before I came here.”

Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina

Addressing systemic racism within fashion leadership

Duffty founded the program with the principal mission of addressing the
lack of diversity in fashion leadership roles, and to be part of the
solution by ultimately empowering the new guard. The program was devised to
regularly accommodate industry experts coming into classrooms who reflect
the diversity of the student body and society at large, African American
designer, Tracy Reese, for example, or Lucy Jones, creator of wheelchair
accessory collection, Ffora. Part-time faculty, such as Candace Marie
Stewart, who is also social media director of Prada US, and Khary Simon, a
global vice president working in the beauty sector, regularly address
systemic racism in fashion advertising and branding in their classes.

Duffty’s goal is hopefully that of every other program director within
the dozens of fashion schools across all fifty states. The incoming student
body, more diverse than ever before, won’t accept anything less, and the
lacklustre leadership landscape outside school is long overdue for a
shake-up. The only Black fashion industry CEO in this year’s Fortune 500,
Jide Zeitlin of fashion holding company Tapestry, which owns Coach, Kate
Spade, and Stuart Weitzman, stepped down recently. Only three Black CEOs
remain, from other industries, none of them female. Curricula must be
deconstructed, and white supremacy eradicated, so that fashion schools do
not perpetuate the classroom Ta-Nehisi Coates describes in his book,
Between the World and Me as “a jail of other people’s interests.”
Ideally schools should be seen as the blueprint for the society of the
future, they are micro-societies. Unfortunately the lack of Black
professionals in the C-Suite seems to be a problem within higher education
too.

The diversity problem in higher education

“The New School as a whole has a diversity problem when it comes to
faculty. Black faces can be seen in the student body, security guards and
cafeteria staff, but Black professors are few and far between,” says
Li-Shan Jordan, a graduate of the Fashion Management program. Of the eleven
professors Duffty assembled, three are Black, of which one is full-time
faculty and two are part-time. In addition, Lacy explains, “When we look to
guest lecturers and mentors we look for people in the industry who have
shared experiences with our students while also exposing our students to
other perspectives and diverse voices.”

Lacy himself shares in class his extensive experience working for
Barneys New York and within the luxury goods sector, specifically speaking
to the issue of diversity in the workplace and how racism has impacted him
professionally. “As an educator or a leader it can be difficult to tell if
what you’re doing is meaningful and received the way in which it is
intended,” he says, acknowledging that there are always improvements to be
made. But when the students presented their capstone projects which
culminated their studies, he experienced a mixture of pride and confidence
that they had made an impact. “So many students tackled the issues of
racism, gender norms, socio-economic concerns, wage for workers, lost
einsteins and so on. I knew we had delivered a program that would create
new leaders who could break down the current systems of injustice and
racism.” Lost Einsteins is a name used to describe people who might have
made highly impactful contributions to society if only they had been
granted the same opportunities as everyone else.

Jordan offers an actionable solution to the lack of faculty diversity,
referencing the initiative launched by designer Aurora James of shoe brand
Brother Vellies, whose 15 Percent Pledge became a social media phenomenon
early in the pandemic. Designed to push retailers to commit to filling 15
percent of their self space with product from Black owned businesses, it is
named for the calculation that 15 percent of the US population is Black. So
far, brands such as Sephora, West Elm, and Rent The Runway have joined the
pledge. “I’d like to see Black professors make up no less than 15% of The
New School’s faculty,” says Jordan.

According to Drouillard there is another major obstacle to progress that
schools have been slow to tackle. Tuition fees in the US are among the
highest in the world yet the value of degrees is increasingly under
question. “Schools have a responsibility to give access to those in
marginalized and disenfranchised groups by looking at merit-based
scholarships and how those are distributed,” he says. “Access but also
inclusion is critical, it’s one thing to get into a good school, but not
having the space to actually succeed is ultimately detrimental.”

The MPS in Fashion Management welcomes students from every background,
and aspires to be dynamic and nimble when addressing issues that will be
important to the cohort post-graduation. Our industry is not only reeling
from a pandemic but was already in major overhaul regarding its ethical and
environmental practices, and these future fixtures of the Fortune 500 could
lift it out of the doldrums, if given the opportunity.

As Lacy points out, “Anyone who has overseen a business knows and
understands, businesses with diverse voices that can be heard are far more
profitable, more authentic, more transparent than those who are not.” Not
only fitting advice for those hiring tomorrow’s leaders but for schools
seeking to assemble a faculty that can inspire and cultivate those leaders.
We can’t afford Lost Einsteins in education either.

Fashion editor Jackie Mallon is also an educator and author of Silk
for the Feed Dogs, a novel set in the international fashion
industry.

*Header photo of MPS graduated cohort and photo of MPS Associate
Director Joshua Williams, FTF Christopher Lacy, Program Director Keanan
Duffty and guest lecturer Tracy Reese provided by Parsons The New School*

Ferrari confirms withdrawal of appeal against Racing Point

As anticipated, Ferrari has dropped its appeal of the verdict against Racing Point’s brake ducts, bringing a formal end to the copying case involving the Silverstone-based outfit.

Racing Point will therefore retain its €400,000 penalty handed out by the FIA as well as the withdrawal of 15 Constructors’ championship points.

Ferrari was the last team to remain involved in the appeal process after Renault, McLaren and Williams had previously withdrawn their appeal.

    Racing Point drops ‘brake duct’ appeal as F1 teams reach resolution for 2021

But a resolution reached among the FIA and F1’s ten teams over a new set of rules governing the use of listed and non-listed parts for 2021 led the Scuderia to also terminate its legal proceedings.

Ferrrai released the following statement after Sunday’s Italian Grand Prix:

“In recent weeks, the collaboration between FIA, F1 and the teams has produced a series of acts – amendments to the 2021 technical and sporting regulations, approved by the F1 Commission and the FIA World Motor Sport Council, and technical directives – which clarify the responsibilities of each championship participant in the design of the components of a single-seater and implement specific monitoring procedures to ensure that both the letter and the spirit of the regulations are fully respected.

“Scuderia Ferrari expresses its appreciation for the timeliness with which the FIA and F1 have effectively tackled a fundamental aspect of the DNA of this highly competitive sport.”

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Click Here: cd universidad catolica

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Pete Buttigieg gambles with criticism of identity politics

Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegScaled-back Pride Month poses challenges for fundraising, outreach Biden hopes to pick VP by Aug. 1 It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process MORE has drawn the 2020 presidential field into a fraught debate over race, warning Democrats that identity politics is a dead end as the party seeks to win back the white working-class voters that broke for President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE in the past election.

Speaking at an LGBT gala over the weekend in Las Vegas, Buttigieg, who is gay and has spoken openly about his own struggles with identity, warned that “so-called identity politics” has contributed to a “crisis of belonging” in the country that has “divided and carved up” people of different backgrounds.

ADVERTISEMENT

The remarks are a gamble for Buttigieg, a white man with a Harvard pedigree, who has struggled to attract the support he’ll need from people of color, even as his presidential campaign has caught fire among white Democrats. 

A Post and Courier survey of South Carolina Democrats released over the weekend found Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Ind., at 18 percent support among white voters and zero percent among black voters.

But Buttigieg’s speech has also cracked open a complex debate on the left as Democrats field their most diverse group of presidential candidates ever.

Democrats are hoping to reach some of those who voted for Trump in 2016, particularly in Midwest and Rust Belt states, even as they cast the administration as racist and accuse the president of promoting policies that are harmful to minorities.

Democrats interviewed by The Hill said it will be a tough line for Buttigieg to toe.

“His speech was nuanced, and he should get credit for that,” Cornell William Brooks, the former president of the NAACP, told The Hill.

“He pointedly called out the identity politics of white supremacy as practiced by the president. He recognized historical wrongs, historical exclusions and the need to hold the center. The question is, why is he elevating identity politics as the moral emergency, as if that’s the threat, rather than the hate we’re seeing percolate on the other side?”

Speaking on Saturday night to the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBT activist group, Buttigieg warned Democrats that shutting out insight from those who are seen as coming from a position of privilege “doesn’t get us very far.”

He said that “divisive lines of thinking” have permeated the Democratic Party, leaving some feeling as if they need to “choose between supporting an auto worker and supporting a trans woman of color, without stopping to think about the fact that sometimes the auto worker is a trans woman of color.”

Buttigieg said he is not drawing “equivalencies between the different patterns of exclusion in this country,” an acknowledgment that members of some minority groups will face obstacles that straight white people will never have to overcome.

But he argued that an obsessive focus on identity would create walls between communities that would ultimately leave the nation “divided and carved up.”

“The more you know about exclusion, the more you think about belonging,” Buttigieg said. “And we have a crisis of belonging in this country.”

The remarks rubbed some the wrong way, including MSNBC host and civil rights leader Al Sharpton.

Buttigieg met with Sharpton last month in Harlem as part of an effort to make inroads into African American communities. Sharpton left that meeting impressed, but he seemed irked by Buttigieg’s remarks on identity.

“Blacks are still doubly unemployed [compared to whites],” Sharpton said on MSNBC. “So yes, we all need to come together and the only way you can come together is … recognizing that I have to come from a further back distance that I didn’t cause … I’m still economically unequal and to tell me to forget about that is insulting.”

Buttigieg’s allies pointed out that he’s not suggesting that the unique obstacles minority groups face should be ignored, but rather that it becomes more difficult for people of different backgrounds to come together when they’re segmented into hierarchies of victimhood and told they have no shared experiences worth exploring.

ADVERTISEMENT

The South Bend mayor has focused heavily on minority outreach in recent weeks, holding meetings with black leaders and activists across South Carolina, a critical early voting state with a large percentage of black Democrats.

But Buttigieg’s sharp upward trajectory in the polls appears to have stalled out at the moment, raising questions about whether he can attract support from the minority communities that will be critical in determining the outcome of the Democratic primary.

Buttigieg’s remarks struck a nerve on the left, leaving Democrats wrestling with the need to correct social injustices and discrimination faced by blacks and Latinos while not alienating white people in the Heartland who are experiencing economic uncertainty.

“Pitting groups against each other is both bad policy and bad politics,” said Adam Hodge, a Democratic strategist. “The winning candidate will be able to pull together a large coalition, and that’s going to mean offering solutions that account for the systemic barriers some of these marginalized groups have faced. We need to be very clear about that reality, while also not avoiding the tough conversations about how the right solutions might be different for different groups across the country.”

Opposition to identity politics had been a hallmark of conservatism until Trump came into office.

The president has frustrated many Republicans by embracing identity politics and powering his campaign with grievances against minority groups, such as Hispanics.

Buttigieg slammed Trump on Saturday night for embracing “peak white identity politics.”

“Many of the objections [to identity politics] come from the right, which is ironic at this time because the current administration has mastered the practice of the most divisive form of such politics — peak white identity politics, designed to drive apart people with common interests,” he said.

And Buttigieg is not alone on the left in criticizing identity politics. Some Democrats, including former President Obama, have begun to warn that liberals have gone too far on that front.

In a speech last year, Obama said Democrats would never win the war of ideas “if you just out of hand disregard what your opponent has to say from the start.”

“You can’t [win a debate] if you insist that those who aren’t like you — because they are white or they are male — that somehow there’s no way they can understand what I’m feeling, that somehow they lack standing to speak on certain matters,” Obama said.

Democrats interviewed by The Hill largely agreed with Obama but said Buttigieg faces a high-wire act in making the same point.

“Pete is going to have to go the extra mile to show that he gets it,” said one Democratic strategist.

Click Here: Putters

3 modelers predict Trump reelection: report

Three modelers are predicting President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE will win reelection in 2020 based on a combination of economic data and incumbent advantages, according to a column in The New York Times.

Steven Rattner wrote that Ray Fair of Yale favors Trump to win based on a model that combines incumbency and gross domestic product growth rates.

The model predicted Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaHarris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Five ways America would take a hard left under Joe Biden Valerie Jarrett: ‘Democracy depends upon having law enforcement’ MORE’s 2008 popular vote margin within a fraction of a percentage point and got within two-tenths of a point for his 2012 vote share, Rattner, who served as a counselor to the Treasury secretary during the Obama administration, added.

ADVERTISEMENT

The model correctly predicting an electoral victory for Trump in 2016, but overestimated his popular vote share by about 5.5 points, which Rattner attributed to Trump’s personal unfavorables.

“In other words, a more ‘normal’ Republican would likely have won the popular vote by a substantial margin (instead of losing it by three million votes),” Rattner wrote.

Trump’s status as the incumbent also puts the odds in his favor for 2020, according to the Obama-era official.

Mark Zandi, Moody’s Analytics’s chief economist, has also said Trump is poised to win based on an analysis of 12 models, while Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics made a similar prediction based on an Electoral College analysis, Rattner noted.

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

“So the question for 2020 may well be whether Mr. Trump can overcome the majority of voters’ poor perception of him and use a good economy and incumbency to win re-election,” he writes.

Buttigieg jokes about getting Pence's vote: 'There's hope for everybody'

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegScaled-back Pride Month poses challenges for fundraising, outreach Biden hopes to pick VP by Aug. 1 It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process MORE joked about getting Vice President Pence’s vote on Monday, effectively continuing the feud between the two Indiana politicians. 

Buttigieg, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, made the comments at an MSNBC town hall with Chris Matthew in Fresno, California.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Let’s talk about people, not like Mike PenceMichael (Mike) Richard PencePence posts, deletes photo of Trump campaign staff without face masks, not social distancing Pence threatens to deploy military if Pennsylvania governor doesn’t quell looting Pence on Floyd: ‘No tolerance for racism’ in US MORE who are never going to vote for you for all kinds of reasons, partisan and other ones,” Matthews said. 

“Hey, there’s hope for everybody,” Buttigieg responded to laughter and applause.

Buttigieg and Pence, who previously served as the governor of Indiana, have traded barbs of the vice president’s religious beliefs on homosexuality. 

Buttigieg accused the vice president of holding his sexuality against him due to Pence’s conservative Christian beliefs about homosexuality.

Pence later responded saying that Buttigieg knows he does not have a problem with him. 

“You know, I’ve known Mayor Pete for many years. We worked closely together when I was governor,” Pence said in an interview. 

Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey

“I considered him a friend,” Pence added. “He knows I don’t have a problem with him.”

Redress Design Award 2020 announces winners

Redress, the environmental charity working to reduce fashion’s waste,
has named menswear designer Le Ngoc Ha Thu from Vietnam and womenswear
designer Juliana Garcia Bello of Argentina as winners of the Redress Design
Awards 2020.

The largest sustainable fashion design competition, now in its 10th
year, challenged fashion designers to showcase sustainable, innovative and
textile waste-reducing designs for a post-Covid-19 fashion world.

The competition attracted entries from hundreds of applicants from 48
countries, with the judges picking out two main winners, who have been
awarded sustainable design collaboration prizes with global leaders, VF
Corporation’s Timberland and award-winning upcycled brand, The R
Collective.

Commenting on his menswear win, designer Le Ngoc Ha Thu, a graduate from
the London College for Design and Fashion, said in a statement: “These last
few weeks with the Redress Design Award has been such a nourishing and
beneficial experience and joining the Timberland and VF teams is going to
be an honour. They are such an amazing brand when it comes to
sustainability – I am ready to learn everything I can from them.”

Womenswear winner, Juliana Garcia Bello, who now lives in The
Netherlands, added: “I have learned so much during my participation in the
Redress Design Award and have definitely come out of this with a reinforced
feeling that collaboration is the key. We designers need to share our
strengths and be inspired by each other to keep finding solutions to the
mounting levels of textile waste.”

In addition, the Redress Design Award 2020 runner-up prize with Orsola
de Castro was awarded to Ruth Weerasinghe from Sri Lanka, who holds a BA
(Hons) Degree in Fashion Design and Marketing from Northumbria University
via the Academy of Design in Colombo, Sri Lanka, while the Hong Kong best
prize winner was Grace Lant, a graduate from Central Saint Martins.

Redress names designers Le Ngoc Ha Thu and Juliana Garcia Bello as its
2020 winners

The winners and runner-ups, along with the other finalists, took part in
a “gruelling series of virtual design and business challenges,” in the two
weeks leading up to the live grand final in Hong Kong, which focused on
real-life sustainability business cases with a spotlight on Covid-19
impacted waste, supported by VF Corporation and TAL Group, makers of one in
six dress shirts in the US.

The ‘Digital Up-cycling Challenge’ saw the finalists using Browzwear
digital design and sampling software to create up-cycled concepts to turn
TAL’s Covid-19-impacted deadstock garment waste into new products for
retail, while the ‘Made for Change Timberland Challenge’ saw the finalists
develop sustainable and scalable business concepts, focusing on responsible
design and re-manufacturing fabric deadstock.

“Fashion’s waste crisis can’t be swept under the carpet any longer,”
explained, Christina Dean, founder of Redress and The R Collective.
“Covid-19’s retail and supply chain disruptions have stranded materials in
warehouses, factories and stores globally. Now is the time to catalyse the
circular economy – and this is Redress’ focus. The Redress Design Award has
for 10 years educated designers about circular design. The industry must
not waste the opportunities that Covid-19’s crisis is offering.”

Redress Design Award 2020 awards All Star Prize to celebrate a decade
of impact

To mark Redress’ decade of impact, the grand final also celebrated the
Redress Design Award 2020 All Stars. This accolade was awarded to
highest-achieving alumni, who were shortlisted from over 200 alumni from 36
countries. Designers Pat Guzik (Poland) and Annaiss Yukra (Peru) were
awarded the All Star Prize, each receiving a retail partnership for their
brands with sustainable marketplace, Staiy. All seven All Star Alumni were
awarded a significant showcase at Galeries Lafayette Shanghai forming part
of the ‘Fashioning Change, Today and Tomorrow’ campaign and gaining brand
promotion within China’s fast-growing fashion market.

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

Images: courtesy of Redress

Third California Democrat launches House bid to challenge Nunes

California Democrat Phil Arballo on Thursday launched a 2020 House campaign to unseat Rep. Devin NunesDevin Gerald NunesSunday shows preview: Protests against George Floyd’s death, police brutality rock the nation for a second week Sunday shows preview: Leaders weigh in as country erupts in protest over George Floyd death The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – George Floyd’s death sparks protests, National Guard activation MORE (R), the controversial ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. 

Arballo, a Latino businessman, is the third Democrat to jump in the race against Nunes, a seven-term congressman who has become a lightning rod of criticism among the left for his staunch loyalty to President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE and his fierce critiques of the intelligence community. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Arballo, however, focused his criticism of Nunes on kitchen-table issues such as health care, farming and trade, zeroing in on the consequences of President Trump’s tariffs. 

“We haven’t heard anything from Devin on how this is hurting our farmers,’’ he said in an interview with Politico. “That’s going to come back to haunt us, and consumers are going to be paying for it down the road.” 

Arballo added that he also looks to hit Nunes over his frequent appearances on Fox News and his defense of the White House over issues such as Russia’s election meddling and impeachment, saying he prioritizes a national profile over district-specific issues and “chooses to be in Washington.”

Arballo already has the backing of Andrew Janz, who ran a tight campaign to unseat Nunes in 2018.

“Phil Arballo is our best chance to defeat Devin Nunes, hands down,’’ Janz told Politico. “I’m proud to support Phil and know that he’ll be the champion the Valley needs.”

Arballo hopes his background as a Mexican American son of a single mother will help him resonate with the district’s Latino voters, who outnumber white voters by a 46 percent to 40 percent margin.

“With the national turnout what it was last time around, we’re excited to see more Latinos and more people of color in the district. There’s a hunger out there from the base,” one party insider told Politico.

To face Nunes, Arballo will first have to win the Democratic primary. Bobby Bliatout, who unsuccessfully ran for the House seat in 2016, and small business owner Dary Rezvani are also running in the race. 

Nunes’s 5-point victory over Janz in 2018 was slimmer than his past reelections, a sign Democrats hope means the California Republican is vulnerable next year. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report, however, rates Nunes’s seat as “Likely Republican.”

Click Here: cd universidad catolica

Warren rises to second in California poll

Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE has a small lead over the field of Democratic contenders in California, but Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Joint Chiefs chairman says he regrets participating in Trump photo-op | GOP senators back Joint Chiefs chairman who voiced regret over Trump photo-op | Senate panel approves 0B defense policy bill Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names MORE (D-Mass.) is hot on his heels and has edged past Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.) into second place, according to a new poll.

The survey from the University of California, Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies finds Biden at 22 percent support. Warren and Sanders are in a statistical tie, at 18 percent and 17 percent, respectively.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook McEnany says Juneteenth is a very ‘meaningful’ day to Trump MORE (D-Calif.), who will need a strong showing in her home state to compete, is in fourth place with 13 percent, followed by South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegScaled-back Pride Month poses challenges for fundraising, outreach Biden hopes to pick VP by Aug. 1 It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process MORE at 10 percent.

California Democrats will cast ballots earlier than in previous cycles, making the most delegate-rich state in the contest a huge prize for the contenders. Voters will cast ballots on Super Tuesday, on March 3.

The U.C. Berkeley survey is the latest poll to find Warren rising as she seeks to overtake Sanders in the race to be the party’s progressive standard-bearer.

A Monmouth University survey released Wednesday of Nevada, which is the third state to vote, found Warren with a clear lead over Sanders, 19 to 13 percent. That was the first public opinion poll to find her ahead of Sanders.

Also on Wednesday, the latest straw poll from the progressive website Daily Kos found Warren surging past Sanders to open up a 34 to 25 percent lead. While that poll is not scientific, it is generally considered an indicator of where the enthusiasm lies with the liberal base.

The new U.C. Berkeley survey of California found that Harris is the top second choice among California voters, with 21 percent, followed by Warren at 17 percent and Biden and Sanders at 12 percent.

When you combine Warren’s support among voters who called her their first or second choice, she has the most support in the entire field, followed closely by Biden, Harris and Sanders.

The U.C. Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll of 2,131 likely Democratic primary voters in California was conducted from June 4 to June 10 and has a 3 percentage point margin of error.

Click Here: Golf special