#WontBeErased: Massive Rally Outside White House to Counter Trump's 'Sick, Cynical' Attempt to Deny Trans People's Existence

Assembling in front of the White House on Monday, members of the LGBTQ community and their allies gathered to deliver a clear message to President Donald Trump: transgender people “Won’t Be Erased.”

The phrase became a rallying cry at demonstrations and on social media the day after reports surfaced of a Trump administration proposal to officially deny the existence of transgender people—defining gender as biological and determined only by genitalia and sex assigned at birth, not relating to how one identifies.

Led by groups including the National Center for Transgender Equality and Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, protesters waved signs reading, “Trans rights are human rights” and “No body is illegal.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Click Here: essendon bombers guernsey 2019

“My existence is not defined by DNA,” Transgender activist Ruby Corado told the crowd. “Our existence is not up for negotiation…No one can take away my dignity, no one can take away my identity.”

On Sunday, the New York Times reported on the Health and Human Services Department’s (HHS) effort to erase government recognition of transgender people and their civil rights, much of which was established by the Obama administration.

“Sex means a person’s status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth,” the department proposed in a memo which was drafted last spring and is set to be officially presented to the Justice Department by the end of the year. “The sex listed on a person’s birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence.”

As Rep. Joe Kennedy III (D-Mass.) wrote on Twitter, the proposal carries an ominous tone for 1.4 million Americans whose existence it effectively denies.

“Trump wants to discriminate and attack people without consequences,” Marge Baker, executive vice president of People for the American Way said in a statement. “His administration wants to eliminate protections for LGBTQ people to appeal to his far-right base. It’s a sick, cynical attempt to bully a marginalized community and distract from his own failures as a leader. Americans must stand firm, and Congress should immediately assert itself against this disgraceful attempt at discrimination.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

"Any 'Her' Will Do": Due Process for Boys Like Kavanaugh, But Feinstein Latest Target of Trump's "Lock Her Up" Chant

Two days after apologizing to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh “on behalf of our nation” for subjecting him to one Senate hearing and a brief FBI probe into several sexual assault allegations against him before allowing him to be confirmed to his lifetime appointment, President Donald Trump clearly dropped the pretense of defending “due process” as he laughed along as audience members chanted “Lock her up!” after he criticized Sen. Dianne Feinstein in Iowa on Tuesday night.

At Trump’s suggestion during a campaign-style rally in Council Bluffs that Feinstein leaked Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s letter regarding her allegations to the press, the audience erupted in the chant as the president smirked and seemed to enjoy the moment.

Among Trump’s supporters, the rallying cry that was directed at Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election now appears to apply to any woman who opposes Trump or stands in the way of his agenda. An audience in Mississippi chanted, “Lock her up” last week after Trump mocked Ford.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

As critics noted on social media, the demand for Feinstein to be “locked up” was in stark contrast to Trump’s attacks on Democrats and Kavanaugh critics who called for the judge to step aside after Ford and two other women came forward with claims that he had committed sexual assault.

As thousands of people protested on Capitol Hill and at Senate offices across the country, demanding their senators vote against Kavanaugh, Trump claimed the opposition to the judge denoted a “very scary time” in the U.S. for young men, who could be accused “of something you may not be guilty of.”

“Due process, fairness, and common sense are now on trial!” Trump tweeted last week.

The president’s concern over due process appears to extend only to white men hoping to rise in the ranks of government or business, critics have noted in recent days. Trump has previously declared people guilty of a crime and called for their punishment—notably after the Central Park Five were falsely accused of rape in 1989. The president, then a private citizen, took out ads in four New York City newspapers calling for the men’s execution—and has insisted they were guilty even following their exoneration in 2014.

Click Here: brisbane lions guernsey 2019

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Extremist Anti-Choice Laws Pass in Two States While Oregon Voters Reject Attempt to Curb Abortion Rights for Low-Income Women

While rejoicing over Oregon voters’ decisive rejection of a measure that would have left low-income residents and state employees without abortion coverage, reproductive rights advocates prepared for battles in two red states where extremist anti-choice proposals were passed on Tuesday night.

In Alabama, the passage of Amendment 2 will give a fetus the same right to life held by a person under the state constitution, paving the way to criminalize abortion with a “trigger ban” like the ones that exist in Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, and South Dakota, should the Supreme Court overturn Roe vs. Wade. Access to contraception and the morning-after pill could also be restricted as a result.

The amendment passed by 18 points, with Alabama voters supporting a proposal that made no mention of exceptions in which a woman’s right to abortion care would trump the rights of a fetus, like in cases involving rape, incest, or risks to a pregnant woman’s life.

“This amendment is so far-reaching that it would allow the state to prosecute women for using IUDs, emergency contraception, and IVF or even for missing prenatal care appointments or not being able to leave an abusive partner,” said the National Abortion Federation (NAF) in a statement after the amendment passed. “Instead of protecting Alabama women and families, Amendment 2 jeopardizes their health and well-being.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

West Virginia voters narrowly voted in favor of another trigger ban—Amendment 1, stating that a woman’s right to abortion is not protected under the state constitution and barring state health insurance plans from covering the medical procedure.

Meanwhile, pro-choice groups celebrated Oregon’s rejection of Measure 106, which also would have cut abortion coverage for public employees and women who use Medicaid by banning the use of state funds for abortion care.

Click Here: Cheap Chiefs Rugby Jersey 2019

“Fortunately, Oregonians saw through this thinly-veiled attempt to restrict women’s access to abortion care and protected the rights of women and their families to make private medical decisions without government interference,” said the NAF. “A right is not a right if you can not afford to access it.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

'Final, Pathetic Stab' at Cherished Endangered Species as House GOP Votes to Strip Protections From Gray Wolves

In a move fiercely condemned by conservation experts and advocates, House Republicans continued their crusade against “arguably the most important law in the United States for conserving biodiversity” and voted mostly along party lines on Friday to strip federal protections from gray wolves.

Noting that “the American people overwhelmingly support the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the magnificent animals and plants it protects,” Brett Hartl of the Center for Biological Diversity declared, “This final, pathetic stab at wolves exemplifies House Republicans’ longstanding cruelty and contempt for our nation’s wildlife.”

Under the Manage Our Wolves Act (H.R. 6784), introduced by Rep. Sean Duffy (R-Wis.), all gray wolves in the lower 48 states—except for Mexican gray wolves—will be removed from the federal list of endangered and threatened species.

“It’s a travesty that a House bill introduced in September with just four cosponsors secures floor time to put these imperiled wolves in the crosshairs of trophy hunters and trappers.”
—Sara Amundson, Humane Society Legislative Fund

“It’s a travesty that a House bill introduced in September with just four cosponsors secures floor time to put these imperiled wolves in the crosshairs of trophy hunters and trappers,” Sara Amundson, president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund, said in a statement.

“The American people have demanded that the Fish and Wildlife Service make a decision based upon scientific evidence that is open to a public comment process,” she pointed out. “Instead, 196 members of Congress passed a bill to deny ESA protections to gray wolves based upon political motivations.”

A provision in the bill bars judicial review, meaning that if it passes the Senate and President Donald Trump signs it into law, the measure cannot be overturned in court. Legal challenges have blocked past attempts to delist the species.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

While hunters and ranchers worried about livestock have long fought for the right to kill gray wolves, pressuring Republicans to ease restrictions, as Marjorie Mulhall of  Earthjustice explained, “thanks to the Endangered Species Act, gray wolves are recovering from the centuries of trapping, hunting, and poisoning that brought them to the brink of extinction in the continental U.S.”

However, as Mulhall noted, “these icons of the wild are still missing from…much of their still-suitable habitat, and have they been subjected to hostile killing practices in places such as Wyoming where they have already lost their Endangered Species Act status. Gray wolves continue to need federal protections.”

Although House Republicans have been working to cripple the ESA since Trump took office, Hartl expressed hope that such efforts will be far less successful in the next congressional session, which begins in January. “We don’t expect to see these disgraceful anti-wildlife votes next year under Democratic control of the House,” he said.

Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee, condemned the vote.

“This bill is a sad, insulting waste of the country’s time, especially with California on fire, and even Republican leaders know it,” Grijalva said in a statement Thursday. “At this very moment we’re seeing some of the deadliest wildfires in our nation’s history, with lives lost and property damage continuing to mount, and here we are voting on whether we should make it easier to kill gray wolves.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership

Tale of Jamal Kashoggi Killing Only Getting More Gruesome

The tale of last year’s brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi took another disturbing turn Sunday. 

In a documentary that aired Sunday night,  Al Jazeera Arabic laid out evidence that the network says strongly indicates Khashoggi’s body was incinerated in an oven in the Istanbul, Turkey, home of the Saudi consulate general. The corpse was transported to the residence in multiple bags before being burned, the documentary claims.  

Click Here: Putters

The story goes from bad to worse:

The blame for Khashoggi’s murder has been laid at the feet of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, though the prince and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia deny any involvement by the prince, claiming instead that the murder was undertaken by rogue elements in the state. 

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

That deniability doesn’t ring true for many with knowledge of the case, however:

As for the prince, he’s recently returned home after an international trip which saw him visit India, Pakistan, and China. Once home, the prince met with President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who serves as a senior advisor to the president. 

 

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Pig & Hen is conquering the world

Bracelets for men, made of sailing rope and steel. That’s Pig & Hen. This young, enthusiastic Dutch fashion brand from Amsterdam is conquering the world with distinctive handmade bracelets.

Pig & Hen is the brand created by founders Dominic Bakker and Rutger Versluis and, like many other top brands, came into being by pure chance. “I have been participating in sailing competitions with my father and younger brother for most of my life”, says Dominic. “One day I made a bracelet with a piece of sailing rope and a shackle. My best friend Rutger noticed it immediately and asked whether I could make him one too.”

Cool bracelet

Rutger visited many fashion outlets as an agent for the Martinique fashion brand and the bracelet was always the topic of conversation. Comments like ‘Cool bracelet, are they available for sale somewhere?’ Dominic: “The orders started trickling in, via our Instagram account too. Rutger had the contacts and I simply made the bracelets at the kitchen table in the evenings. We exhibited at De Modefabriek in Amsterdam soon after this. We went home with no fewer than 35 shop orders. This is when we realised: ‘Okay, now it’s getting serious’! We came back from the expo on the Monday, we had acquired premises on the Thursday, two members of staff were hired on the Friday and we went into production on the Saturday.”

Seafarers

That was also the moment we needed to start thinking about branding. Dominic stumbled upon a great and relevant story from maritime history during a Google session: “The Netherlands has always been a country of seafarers and explorers. Sailors had tattoos of a pig or a chicken on their feet to protect them from harm. They believed the tattoos would give them the ability to survive if they became shipwrecked. They believed that – like the pigs and chickens stowed on board in wooden crates – they would float and that the tide would carry them ashore. So, Pig & Hen it was.”

Salty Steve

Each Pig & Hen bracelet is given an imaginative name. Salty Steve, Vicious Vik, or Sharp Simon; each with a connection to a cool sailing theme. What started with a piece of sailing rope and a standard shackle has now developed into a large collection of bracelets “We currently have eighteen unique designs. And new designs are added each season. We launch a new collection twice a year and a special edition collection twice a year too. That’s a total of around sixty unique designs every year. Whereas we previously used materials which were available to us, we now develop our own materials, colour combinations and fasteners. For example, we have metal bracelets in which the sailing rope has been incorporated in a unique way. We will be launching our leather range of bracelets next year.”

No longer the underdog

Pig & Hen has developed from an underdog into a serious contender in the realm of men’s bracelets over the past six years. More than forty enthusiastic Pig & Henners at the Amsterdam head office ensure hundreds of unique bracelets are shipped every day. Pig & Hen has almost four thousand Trustpilot reviews, with an average score of 4.9. What’s the secret of this success? Dominic: “A good quality product, strong branding and delivering on your promises. That is the key. We are a young and enthusiastic brand for globetrotting, adventurous men who appreciate craftsmanship. Our bracelets are authentic, distinctive and sophisticated at the same time, each boasting unique details. Every single bracelet is handmade in our studio in Amsterdam with love and attention. Each bracelet is quality checked before it leaves us. And everything is packaged and delivered with the greatest of care.”

Coolness

Pig & Hen is continuing to go full steam ahead. How does Dominic see the future? “Pig & Hen is still a big adventure for us. Every day is a new voyage of discovery and we would like to keep it that way. Six years ago, men’s bracelets were still uncharted territory. The jewellery segment featured a few designs and you would find some simple bracelets at the market. But there was nothing in between in terms of coolness and brand experience. We managed to fill that void and look at us now: we are leaders where both brand awareness and product are concerned. Men all over the world wear our bracelets, from America to Asia and from Africa to Australia. Incredible when you think about it. Our market is big, very big. We certainly have enough to keep us busy for the time being.”

Purchase Pig & Hen as a retailer? Explore the collection on the

Click Here: Putters

Democrats get early start in Iowa

The Democratic presidential primary has already begun in Iowa — more than a year before the first-in-the-nation caucuses on Feb. 3, 2020.

Hawkeye State voters have actually been seeing presidential ads for months, something even the most ardently political residents see as a bit much.

Many of the ads are touting Rep. John DelaneyJohn DelaneyThe Hill’s Coronavirus Report: Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas says country needs to rethink what ‘policing’ means; US cases surpass 2 million with no end to pandemic in sight Minnesota AG Keith Ellison says racism is a bigger problem than police behavior; 21 states see uptick in cases amid efforts to reopen The Hill’s Coronavirus Report: Singapore Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan says there will be consequences from fraying US-China relations; WHO walks back claims on asymptomatic spread of virus MORE (D-Md.), the little-known congressman who has made a bet that by getting to Iowa early, he could turbocharge a campaign in 2020 with a good showing in the Iowa caucuses. He has run more than 3,100 ads in the states.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tom Steyer, the California billionaire, is also a frequent presence on Iowa television screens.

He has run more than 2,000 ads in the last year in Iowa promoting his calls for President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE’s impeachment. Steyer hasn’t announced a run for the White House, but the ads, which also play in Washington, D.C., had a decidedly presidential feel to them, and could certainly lay the groundwork for a campaign.

The early ads have people in Iowa wondering what to expect next given the intense interest in politics in the Trump era and the crowded field of candidates expected to seek the Democratic nomination.

Some aren’t exactly relishing what’s to come given the early advertising assault.

“It’s more like, ‘Oh my God, it’s already coming at us,’ ” said Steffen Schmidt, a professor of political science at Iowa State University. “People here already think the political season is much too long.” 

It’s unclear how much Delaney or Steyer have helped themselves with their early advertising.

Democratic strategist Tracy Sefl, who hails from Iowa, said that she didn’t think that the television spots had done much for either of them.

“Fall 2018? The University of Iowa football coach has greater name recognition, more front page photos and would almost certainly get more votes,” Sefl said, adding, “So I wish everyone well and trust that Democrats have learned how best to spend our dollars.”

The advertising spending represents a “dramatic shift” from a year ago, according to a report earlier this month in The Des Moines Register. Four years ago, as Republicans and Democrats prepared for a presidential election, there were just two ads, which only aired nine times, to this point in the race.  

The newspaper reported an analysis of television ads by Kantar Media that showed that of the more than 10,500 ads related to the 2020 presidential election that have aired around the country, more than half of those spots have been in Iowa.

Delaney, who has invested much of his time traveling throughout Iowa’s 99 counties, has aired around 60 percent of the ads in Iowa, according to the data reported in the Register.

“2018 is just ahead of the curve,” Madeline Meininger, a senior analyst at Kantar Media told The Hill, adding that there’s more volume and more spending across the board. 

Meininger said the early media buys are an indication of what’s to come during the upcoming primary, adding that the political atmosphere is “so charged and energized that people want to get in the race.” 

The rationale, traditionally speaking, for getting out early would be to go up with uninterrupted advertising time to build a candidate’s brand. 

But media strategists say there’s little advantage to getting out so early, particularly when they’re competing for attention from political candidates in Iowa running in the midterms this November.

“I’d say it’s an unusual play to be advertising this early when there are active races going on in the state,” said Anson Kaye, a strategist at the media firm GMMB who also worked on former President Obama’s campaign in 2012 and Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWhite House accuses Biden of pushing ‘conspiracy theories’ with Trump election claim Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton qualifies to run for county commissioner in Florida MORE’s campaign in 2016.

But Kaye and other strategists were quick to point out that after Trump won the election in 2016, anything is possible. 

An Iowa-based spokeswoman for Delaney could not be reached for comment. 

Kevin Mack, the lead strategist for Steyer’s organization NeedtoImpeach.com, said the billionaire’s goal is to make the biggest difference he can in 2018.

As for 2020, Steyer will assess what the Democratic field looks like and make a decision, Mack said. 

But for now, the ads in the state are helping to build a movement in Iowa.

The anti-Trump organization has no plans of stopping the ads, Mack said. In fact, next week, they’ll begin “addressable television ads,” aimed at Direct TV and Dish Network viewers. 

While other would-be Democratic candidates in 2020 haven’t taken to the airwaves yet in Iowa, they’ve been making the rounds.

Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D), Rep. Tim RyanTimothy (Tim) RyanMinnesota AG Keith Ellison says racism is a bigger problem than police behavior; 21 states see uptick in cases amid efforts to reopen Congress must fill the leadership void Pelosi pushes to unite party on coronavirus bill despite grumbling from left MORE (Ohio) and even Michael Avenatti, the lawyer representing porn star Stormy Daniels have all made visits in recent weeks.

Schmidt says he’s convinced it’s all too early. 

“I’m not sure that positioning yourself now is going to make a difference,” he said. “Sometimes it’s the people who come out of nowhere who capture the imagination.” 

Click Here: camiseta river plate

Trump Jr. to campaign for Cruz in close Texas Senate race

Donald Trump Jr.Don John TrumpTrump Jr. calls elderly supporter who was assaulted Trump Jr. hits Howard Stern for going ‘establishment,’ ‘acting like Hillary’ Trump Jr., GOP senator lash out at Facebook for taking down protest pages on stay-at-home orders MORE, is reportedly headed to Texas to campaign for GOP Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump’s public standing sags after Floyd protests GOP senators introduce resolution opposing calls to defund the police MORE in his reelection bid for the Senate.

ABC News reported that the president’s eldest son will be campaigning for Cruz — who ran against his father during the 2016 presidential election — on Wednesday at a rally in Wichita Fallas, roughly two hours outside of Dallas.

Trump is expected to be joined by his girlfriend, former Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle, the outlet reported.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report comes months after Cruz said he contacted the president to seek support in his reelection campaign.

Trump announced weeks later that he would hold a “major rally” for the Texas Republican as he continues to face a tough race against his Democratic challenger, Rep. Beto O’RourkeBeto O’RourkeBiden will help close out Texas Democrats’ virtual convention: report O’Rourke on Texas reopening: ‘Dangerous, dumb and weak’ Parties gear up for battle over Texas state House MORE.

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

“I will be doing a major rally for Senator Ted Cruz in October,” Trump said in late August. “I’m picking the biggest stadium in Texas we can find. As you know, Ted has my complete and total Endorsement. His opponent is a disaster for Texas – weak on Second Amendment, Crime, Borders, Military, and Vets!”

Trump Jr.’s visit to Texas also reportedly precedes a campaign appearance from Vice President Pence, who is expected to campaign for Cruz at an event in Dallas in the coming week, the Dallas Morning News reported.

Though Texas hasn’t elected a Democrat to the Senate in decades, a number of polls have pointed to a narrowing margin between the two candidates.  

Cruz leads O’Rourke by just 4.5 percent, according to the RealClearPolitics average of polls.

Romney defends Trump’s policies as ‘effective,' disputes he led 'never Trump' movement

Utah Senate candidate and former GOP presidential nominee Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyMilley discussed resigning from post after Trump photo-op: report Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names Attorney says 75-year-old man shoved by Buffalo police suffered brain injury MORE claimed Saturday that he wasn’t a leader in the “never Trump” movement among conservatives, and said some of the president’s policies have been “pretty effective.”

Romney was asked following a rally in support of Arizona Senate candidate Rep. Martha McSallyMartha Elizabeth McSallyGOP senators introduce resolution opposing calls to defund the police No evidence of unauthorized data transfers by top Chinese drone manufacturer: study Senate Democratic campaign arm launches online hub ahead of November MORE (R) about where he stands with President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE given his fierce criticism of the president during the 2016 campaign.

“You led the ‘never Trump’ movement. I mean, what happened with that?” a reporter asked in a video posted online.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think that was the case,” Romney responded. “President Trump was not the person I wanted to become the nominee of our party, but he’s president now. The policies he’s promoted have been pretty effective, and I support a lot of those policies.”

He then pivoted to discussing McSally’s tight Senate race in Arizona, which he said will determine whether the country will be “guided by conservative principles, or are we going to take a sharp turn left.”

Romney during the 2016 campaign delivered a speech blasting then-candidate Trump as a “phony,” and a “fraud” who was “playing members of the American public for suckers.”

Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey

The 2012 GOP presidential nominee and Trump have since patched things up, with the president offering his endorsement as Romney seeks to replace retiring Sen. Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchBottom line Bottom line Bottom line MORE (R-Utah) in the Senate.

Romney has asserted that while he agrees with Trump on a number of policy issues, he will speak out against the president on issues where he disagrees.

Progressives Outraged as House Democrats Elect 'Big Money' Centrist Hakeem Jeffries Over Barbara Lee for Caucus Chair

In a bid to move the party’s leadership in a more bold direction, progressive groups and activists mobilized urgently in recent weeks to pressure House Democrats to elect Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) as the party’s next Caucus Chair.

But, ultimately, their campaign was not enough to overcome the party establishment’s support for the more “moderate” Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), who was elected on Wednesday by a vote of 123-113.

“Jeffries is a big money Democrat and a member in good standing of Andrew Cuomo’s New York machine. There is no way to spin his victory over Barbara Lee as a sign the party is moving in a progressive direction.”
—Zach Carter, Huffington Post

Jeffries’ victory over Lee was met with dismay by progressives, who viewed the anti-war congresswoman’s defeat at the hands of her House Democratic colleagues as yet another sign that the party badly needs a new direction.

“What is there to say anymore? The Democratic Party establishment needs to be primaried into oblivion,” Margaret McLaughlin, a member of the Metro D.C. branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), wrote on Twitter.

While Jeffries is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), critics and reporters argued that his overwhelming reliance on big money donors and his positions on major issues raise serious questions about his commitment to the kinds of bold policies that swept “the most progressive freshman class” in U.S. history into office in the November midterms and gave Democrats control of the House.

“Jeffries is a big money Democrat and a member in good standing of [Gov.] Andrew Cuomo’s New York machine,” noted Huffington Post reporter Zach Carter. “There is no way to spin his victory over Barbara Lee as a sign the party is moving in a progressive direction.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

As The Economist noted in a profile of the New York congressman published in September, “Jeffries is not a member of the moderate New Democrats faction, but he often sounds as if he should be.”

“Our caucus today denied Barbara Lee the honor she deserved of being Chair. But the petty politics of members of Congress will never be able to deny her her place in history. She towers above those who rejected her.”
—Rep. Ro Khanna”He is a fan of charter schools and fiscal rectitude,” The Economist reported. “Though he supports the principle of universal healthcare coverage, he speaks of ‘the importance of market forces and getting things done in a responsible fashion.’ Quoting Ronald Reagan approvingly, he suggests this means promoting a flourishing private sector outside the ‘legitimate functions’ of government.”

Additionally, critics recalled after he won Wednesday’s election that Jeffries issued a fawning statement in support of Israel as the nation carried out Operation Protective Edge, the vicious 2014 attack on the occupied Gaza Strip that left thousands of Palestinians dead.

“When you live in a tough neighborhood Israel should not be made to apologize for its strength,” Jeffries declared. “You know why? Because the only thing that neighbors respect in a tough neighborhood is strength.”

Aida Chavez, a reporter for The Intercept, also called attention to Jeffries’ derisive 2016 comments about Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who he smeared as a “gun-loving socialist with zero foreign policy experience.”

With his victory over Lee, Jeffries will take the number five House Democratic leadership spot in the next Congress, replacing Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.)—who was ousted in June by democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Responding to the New York Times‘ narrative that Jeffries’ win represents a victory for a “new” and younger generation of House Democrats, Waleed Shahid—communications director for Justice Democrats—argued that focusing on the age gap between Lee and Jeffries obscures their very real ideological contrasts.

“‘New generation’ can’t simply mean diversifying the ruling class. We need diverse representation and progressive politics,” Shahid concluded. “There were clear differences between Lee and Jeffries: message, policy priorities, and records of taking on the one percent and establishment in their own party.”

Responding to Lee’s loss on Twitter, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) wrote: “Our caucus today denied Barbara Lee the honor she deserved of being Chair. But the petty politics of members of Congress will never be able to deny her her place in history. She towers above those who rejected her.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: racing club camiseta