Beers for Spain and Instagram: VOX and the youth vote

During the first conference organised by the Centre of the Analysis of the Radical Right in London last May, Cas Mudde in his wonderful plenary drew our attention to the relationship between the Radical Right and younger generations.

VOX, the far-right Spanish political party, seems to have very close bonds with some sectors of Spanish youth, and well aware of it, has a lot of strategies to reinforce them.

It may seem unusual that a political force which has been accused of being ‘stuck in the past’ keeps such a strong link with younger generations. Theoretically, left parties should be more attractive to the young since anti-establishment rebellion and idealism are features inherently associated with the earlier stages of life. That was the case of the socio-political movement of “Los indignados or the 15-M movement” that gave birth to the far left party Podemos, made up mostly by thousands of supporters under 35.

Despite still being chronologically in its infancy – VOX was “born” in December 2013 – the far-right Spanish party stands head and shoulders among other political forces in the country by being the undeniable master in dealing with marketing strategies that reinforce links with their youngest voters.

Those strategies are both online and offline. If we follow the social media theorist Nathan Jurgenson and his strong critique of digital dualism, online and offline worlds are not different dimensions and cannot be distinguished one from the other since both are intertwined. Extrapolating this tenet to the world of politics, the online behaviour of a party has offline consequences (i.e. in election results) – hence the extreme importance of its Internet persona.

Online, VOX have skilfully used all the potential social media platforms and applications available to connect with their cubs. Their frenzied activity on Twitter, for instance, via the individual accounts of their leaders or through the party’s accounts (@vox_es, @vox_noticias, @voxjovenes, among many others – including separate accounts for their activities in the parliament and in the congress) is endless. I would like to specially highlight their dynamic activity on Instagram since it is the social platform in Spain that has manifestly increased its popularity in recent years, in 2018 being declared the preferred social media platform among Spanish teenagers, with 60% of the users from 14-17 years old.

VOX is the absolute king in the Spanish political Instagram kingdom. In February 2019, it had more than 120,000 followers and in July of the same year (350,000). That represents way more followers than the two major left parties, the socialist party (73,8000) and Podemos (175,000) taken together. VOX overwhelmingly posts videos. There is hardly any sign of photos but rather they prefer moving images: videos of their political leaders taking part in public meetings, criticizing their political opponents, celebrating the different historic-traditional dates or festivals or encouraging students to study for their university entrance exams (“for the future of Spain”) just to mention a few of their uses. In other words, VOX knows how important the youth is for their political goals so they cherish and pamper their junior supporters. VOX knows how important the youth is for their political goals so they cherish and pamper their junior supporters.

Beers for Spain

Probably, the most outstanding youth movement associated to VOX is “Cañas por España” (Beers for Spain) that started off as regular informal meetings of young people who wanted to have a beer with the politicians and journalists with whom they share the same approach to life once a month.

The name of the movement itself is quite resonant with meaning. They are using two words containing the letter “ñ”, the most distinctively Spanish orthographical symbol, frequently selected when speakers want to show their patriotism. Add to this the choice of the word “caña” (slang for beer) with its informal, approachable ambience – all at the same time without losing sight of the spirit of the whole activity (“por España”, for Spain). Members of the movement don’t want to be recognised as the “cubs of VOX” in line with the approach of the Popular Party with its “new generations”. Instead what started with shared political concerns, as an informal meeting of friends with politicians “to have some beers and approach the politicians the youngsters admire” has begun to grow organically to the point where they now have delegates in 27 provinces, more than 18.000 followers on Twitter and more than 22,000 on Instagram. To be part of this volunteer movement, you don’t have to pay any fees just “prioritise study, be a good son or daughter and be committed to the best for Spain”

In an interview (that you will naturally find on Instagram) made with leader Santiago Abascal, last April, he stated that the reasons why the youngest generations of voters support VOX is because they need a future but also to find their roots, their identity and to feel a “patriotism” (the word repeated most often in the whole interview) that nobody before Vox has offered them. He claims young people do not want to be identified with any ideology but just with “normal (sic) things” that prevent them from doing anything crazy. Abascal’s discourse is again rooted in that appeal to ‘common sense and sensibleness’ that we can see feature in all far right European parties nowadays.

So, it seems that VOX will enjoy the support of hundreds of thousands of young prospective voters in the near-term. The public meetings held in the last political campaigns showed that plenty of those voters were just teenagers who have not even reached the legal age to vote. Leaving aside sociological and psychological reasons no doubt underlying all this, what it is indisputable is the effort the far right party invests in getting to communicate with young people. Maybe, this is an area the other political forces should work on.

Visit the Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right (#CARR)

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

What we could learn from lawyers – and from China – about protecting the planet

James Thornton is not what you expect from a New York lawyer. He has a soft lyrical voice; each statement he makes is carefully balanced and deeply considered; he practices Buddhism, is gay, and drinks green tea.

But he is fierce. This one man poses the greatest threat to polluting companies operating in Europe. Is this hyperbole? Well, the founder of ClientEarth was presented with the Financial Times’ Special Achievement Award at the Innovative Lawyer Awards in 2016, and has been named as one of ten people who could change the world by the New Statesman. He has been working with high ranking Chinese officials to revolutionise environmental law across one of the world’s biggest economies. These and grander accolades fill his Wikipedia entry.

ClientEarth is a not-for-profit environmental law firm that now has offices in London, Brussels, Warsaw, Berlin and Beijing. Thornton is perhaps best known for the Clean Air Campaign, in which he brought the UK Government to the Supreme Court for “failing to protect its citizens against air pollution”. Aspects of the case were taken up by the Court of Justice of the EU leading the way to further suits against companies across the continent.

Transforming practice

Thornton’s aim is, simply, “to save civilisation”, he told me during an interview at his modest office in Hackney, east London. His method is fundamentally transforming the practice of environmental law in the UK. And, in this, he is succeeding.

He is fighting to get the UK government to accept in full the European Aarhus Convention. This would ensure our rights as citizens to access justice without it being prohibitively expensive. In particular, environmentalists who lose cases brought against polluters would not be buried under millions in legal costs.

“My view of the world is – as the Chinese say – crisis / opportunity. The crisis is now more clear than it has ever been. We have seen the emerging crisis – as I did when I was at university, which is a long time ago now. With each passing year it becomes more obvious.

“When you have the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change saying we have 12 years to make a serious shift if we want to save civilisation essentially – that’s a turning point in culture. I now feel that the job is really saving civilisation. If you want to save civilisation you have to take care of the environment, because civilisation depends on the environment. It’s the most obvious thing.”

Transforming civilization

Thornton goes on: “The crisis is more clear because things have got much worse since I began, in terms of climate change, loss of biodiversity has accelerated enormously in the last 30 years. I try and carefully monitor the science in all these areas as much as I can. I have been watching the earth warm and these species die my entire adult lifetime.

“How can you go on – and the answer is that you can go on if you dedicate yourself to saving civilisation. And then, ‘is it possible to do that’?”

This tireless campaigning has placed James at the intersection between those members of the public most concerned about the environment, corporate power and the government, and its legal system.

His high-level strategic approach and exhaustive knowledge of the detail of UK law means there are perhaps few who understand the interplay of power in the UK today as well as he does.

Brexit and China

James has commanded a front row seat as the theatre of Brexit has unfolded, and his review is damning. He is keen to share what he has learned about Brexit with anyone keen to learn.

He also holds a particular interest in China, and has spent a considerable amount of time working with Chinese officials and legal professionals in implementing what the Chinese Communist Party has called the Ecological Civilisation through the reform of its legal system. There is much to be gained from comparing Brexit UK with China in terms of how each country is acting on the existential threat of climate breakdown.

Let’s begin at home. The unfolding calamity of Brexit has already had profound and long lasting impacts on environmental regulation in the UK, and we are only just at the beginning of this process. James begins by expressing dismay: “My greatest sadness is that a great country is leaving the stage.

“Britain has had an enormously positive and powerful impact in Europe even though it has always had this love-hate relationship in terms of environmental regulation. And one of the successes of the European project has been environmental regulation. The standards today are much higher than if the countries had made it on their own. The ambitions set were very high. Britain, even when it has resisted new regulation, is often better than other countries at following the rules – its part of the national character.”

Environmental protections

The fear is that if Britain continues with Brexit, it will no longer be beholden to European regulations and our air, our rivers, are farmland and our cities will be damaged as a result.

Brexit will inevitably have a profoundly negative impact on environmental regulations in the UK, he warns. “Even with good intentions there will be so much chaos in terms of law and rule making in the UK that environmental regulation will not be the main focus and that the environment will therefore suffer”. Further, “the big industrial players will always argue for reduced regulation.”

The direct threat of Brexit is that the act of transferring vast swathes of EU regulation into British law will allow corporations – incumbent economic actors – with little regard for environmental concerns to gut these rules from the inside. This can be clearly understood with reference to the work ClientEarth has done on clean air.

“The negative economic consequences will make it harder to protect the environment. Will the government do what it says in retaining environmental standards? There is an opportunity – we could do even better. But there is a risk that the attention will be attention will be elsewhere, the focus will not be on protecting the environment.

“The government isn’t really coping even with the negotiations, let alone the reality. When the reality hits, will there be strong focus be on protecting the environment. One can hope so, one can argue how things could be better. But I doubt it. It is going to take a lot of work by citizens demanding environmental protection.”

Clean air

James confirms that Britain leaving the negotiating table could also mean that the more progressive European countries will lose an important ally in protecting and enhancing EU-wide regulations. Britain has, for example, been “one of the leading voices for good, strong Common Fisheries Policy that would allow for sustainable fishing. So there will be arguments where [Britain’s] absence will make a difference.”

The argument that Brexit will be an opportunity for business to undermine government regulation has been articulated by environmentalists almost since the referendum. But James is able to provide clear and compelling evidence of how this will play out.

He cites the work around forcing the government to meet EU regulations on clean air, particularly in London where traffic pollution is harming people’s physical and mental health.

“UK citizens are now really clear that they want clean air, and do not want to die from air pollution. I think it would be hard to reduce legal requirements. But the wrong government might well try, and the wrong government might well succeed. And in doing that, would they try and take away a citizen’s right to enforce the law against a UK government? They might well try, and they could well succeed. These issues of how the law settles are completely open.

“The way that all laws are being taken over from European law into the corpus of law in the United Kingdom is that some of it becomes primary legislation. There will be an air quality law. But the key provisions of this air quality law that will determine whether a child is exposed to air pollution – what is the level of air pollution that is allowed – it looks like that will be coming over as secondary legislation.

“Secondary legislation is easily amended and Parliament gets little or no scrutiny. So the fear – and it is quite a correct fear – is that environmental legislation, labour legislation, could be brought over and the key operative parts that determine what the impact the legislation has on real human beings could be put into secondary legislation – and then some midnight Tuesday operation could go on where suddenly you find it’s all much more lax than you thought.

Shock doctrine

“Such a government could claim they have all the same laws, and they are meeting those same laws, but it just so happens that the level of requirements has gotten much lower. And that is enormous. It requires huge vigilance – and how will you interest the public in that when only geeks like us care? It has a big impact – more kids getting asthma, and those with asthma getting worse.”

Click Here: watford football shirts

He adds: “All these laws were built up over decades, and they took lots of work over decades and decades. So for them to all come over, and to have to potentially start over on all of them – in one country when the great efficiency of the EU is that they apply to every country – is an enormous ask.

“For a hypothetical government with bad intentions this is an enormous opportunity to make all of the standards worse. It’s rather like Shock Doctrine. If you have a government that is ill disposed to environmental regulations and protecting its citizens…you can see the results.”

Rough trade

The second major area of contention around Brexit is trade. The most vociferous advocates of leaving the EU argue that this will allow for free trade agreements with countries all around the world – increasing exports for British industry and creating jobs while also importing cheaper produce and reducing prices at the till.

Both these ‘benefits’ are predicated on EU produce being more expensive – because of the high environmental and labour regulation which has been introduced. The promise of free trade agreements has not come to pass – but do UK shoppers really want meat and other foods from deregulated producers?

“If we leave, under whatever arrangement, that allows us to have entirely separate trading arrangements the naïveté of current government actors will be exposed and we will find that out that it has not been easy to get even better trading relationships with the rest of the world, quite the opposite.

“We will then be extremely vulnerable to the United States forcing [its produce into the market] – the short hand is chlorinated chicken. The Agriculture Secretary in the United States has made it clear that ‘if you want a trade deal you will have to take all our farm produce the way it is’ – and it is a very different set of standards to the EU.”

He also confirmed that there was a “genuine threat” that the UK would have to accept imports of food and other goods that only confirm to the standards of the originating country, and not those of the UK. This is a trojan horse that will deliver chlorinated beef and hormone injected beef from the US, Australia and other trading partners to our supermarket shelves.

Black hole

“If we get what the people who love Brexit love to call sovereignty, the sovereignty to have our own trade deals – what they do not seem to understand is that trade deals are done on the basis of power entirely. It always comes down to power. ‘The rules are going to be set the way we want them because we are powerful’. That’s the way it is.

“Is the US more powerful than the UK in these terms? Well most countries are – certainly the big blocs are. The US is, the EU will be, China is, Russia is. You may be driven to take the lowest common denominator. It’s not what people say they want. But they may be forced into that position. It’s a genuine worry.”

Whether we leave or not, Brexit has already caused enormous damage. The momentum for environmental regulation – think of the Climate Change Act – which was built up by decades of hard work by campaigners across the UK has been lost. There has been almost no parliamentary debate, news coverage or national conversation about the environmental threats – large and small – that we must address. Extinction Rebellion taking over central London occupied a few days between years of Brexit debate.

“The other thing that is really upsetting about Brexit is it has been just a colossal black hole in everyone’s time and attention,” James said. “And it’s not going to stop. If May’s proposals to go through, there is another two full years of negotiations.

“As since the UK government has not said peep about what it actually wants, you will have the same arguments for another two years. It’s been three years. In that case, it will be the government in complete standstill for five years, not accomplishing anything at all…It’s a tremendous amount of more nonsense before you get to the end of the process, including renegotiating all these laws, on environment, labour, everything else.

“And this is the time when we have 12 more years to make a huge change if we are going to save civilisation. At the most crucial time in human history to save civilisation for future generations, Britain has decided to take itself off into a crazy, self regarding, destructive, downward spiral and focus on nothing meaningful.”

He added: “There were very negative players. Russia had a very big impact on Brexit. Russia – and Trump – had an interest in the EU collapsing, because the EU is a very progressive project. For both, Putin and Trump, the disintegration of the EU to whatever extent possible removes a beacon of hope from the whole world, and an alternative power bloc.”

Incumbents

The farce of Brexit is at its essence a conflict of beliefs about who is the perpetrator, who are the victims and who is the rescuer – to use the language of Stephen Karpman’s drama triangle.

The Brexiteers believe business is vital and benevolent – creating wealth and jobs – while the state is authoritarian, limiting, dangerous. Remainers seem to feel that the state is necessary, protective, benevolent – and that the big state of the EU is better placed than the UK government to hold back the tide of multinational corporate power. But for both, the citizenry is placed in the position of victim – needing business or government to meet its needs.

The story that James tells is, to me, far more compelling because it is the citizen that is given the role of hero – more in the school of Joseph Campbell – and it falls to us citizens to challenge power: and the malevolent force in this story is the ‘incumbents’ of corporate monopolies who inhibit innovation in the major industries. This is very much in keeping with Adam Smith’s attack on monopoly power in all its forms. The victims, here, are the small companies bringing renewable power to the market. But it falls to us to slay the dragons.

“The car companies are a good example of this. There was an announcement recently of an investigation by the EU into what appears to be – the EU thinks – collusion between car companies to prevent the introduction of pollution reduction systems. They created a cartel – in this case a complex monopoly – to prevent the introduction of pollution technology that they knew would save lives, and to delay it for as long as possible. Astounding.

“They did not start out with bad intentions. Diesel engines look like a good idea: they are efficient and they last a long time. And, by the way, they make a lot of money. So let’s ignore the bad news about them, and then we go a few more feet into badness by preventing pollution control because we will save quite a bit of money. We will be able to run it this way for five more years, because that will generate this much profit.”

Killing the dragons

“It does not start out with evil intentions, but you end up with this banality of evil accounting which turns their actions into the actions of monsters. They think they are making rational decisions – they are making rational decisions, but they are making immoral decisions, sometimes unlawful decisions.

“What do we do to shake them up? Back to this idea of the incumbents, so you have incumbents in the car industry, and in the energy industry. You have new companies that come in who can deliver clean transport, who can deliver clean energy. But the companies that are inventing that stuff, they are entrepreneurial, they are small, generally. They have the cool technology.

“But they do not have the wherewithal to fight the incumbents in court, they do not have the money. They do not have the expertise. The governments do not have any interest in doing this because the incumbents have so much influence.

So Germany looks like a green country, but as you begin to understand more deeply and as the Green party will tell you, ‘we are in some ways Green but we are also run by the car companies’, the influence of the car companies are so enormous that the country is beholden to them.

“So who is going to do it? The incumbents are sitting in the middle of the roadway, like dragons. And if you cannot move them, then the good solutions are not going to flow through. The markets for the first time can deliver this stuff, but the markets on their own are not going to because you have these dragons sitting in the middle of the roadway. So who is going to kill the dragons? Citizens have to do it. But then you need sharp weapons. And that is where litigation comes in.”

ClientEarth

James here explains the role of ClientEarth. It is not the hero, but instead a weapon in the arsenal of the citizenry in confronting its nemesis – polluters and vested interests. But just when we need this weapon most, as we are about the confront the final ordeal of climate breakdown, Brexit threatens to blunt this axe.

Brexit poses a direct threat to the work that ClientEarth does. This includes further uncertainty in relation to an application for EU funding to support environmental NGOs in China. James argues that the space for NGOs to work in China is now opening up, even as it closes down in European countries where right wing parties are coming into power. “This will be thrown into question by Brexit, with our HQ then being in a non-EU country.”

The charity currently has 90 lawyers practicing in courts across the EU, with 100 cases coming on in member state courts or the higher European courts. This work is “entirely unaffected”. But Brexit has sent shockwaves through its London offices.

James estimates that 40 percent of the UK-based staff are EU citizens, and there remains deep uncertainty about their status after Brexit. This means young families having to move countries, severing ties with family and community.

“Where will our employees be able to live? We do not know the honest answer. We have had to bring lawyers in, to advise them on their rights, so they can begin to understand where they might apply, and where there will be problems.”

Ecological civilisation

The potential breakdown in British environmental regulation during Brexit is placed in dramatic relief when James compares it to recent events in China. We take great pride in being an open, democratic, free market society which we compare favourably with the autocratic quasi-Communism in ‘the East’. The reality is more complex. James has spent the last five years working with high ranking Chinese officials to reform the law – giving insight which is incredibly rare.

China has instigated its transformation into an ‘ecological civilisation’. This promises to fundamentally change all aspects of Chinese national and civic life. “This is a deep, positive and powerful concept, which has given me a lot of hope,” James tells me. “They mean it. I have had conversations with a variety of senior people and ecological civilisation is a meaningful concept – it is not a slogan.”

He adds: “It’s quite clear that from the top on down in China they need no convincing, they understand the science, they completely get it, and they are trying to turn their whole country around as fast as possible on the environment – and they are very very clear about it. Here you have the Rupert Murdoch influenced media in the English language world sowing discord, and you have ExxonMobil and its peers sewing discord so that otherwise intelligent people are confused about these things.

“That does not happen in China. The politicians are also engineers – on the Politburo there are a lot of engineers – so if they see there is a problem, what an engineer says is, ‘how do we solve that most efficiently’. And it is a completely different mindset. They are saying, how do we solve this efficiently? That’s where we come in, we and other Western experts, or foreign experts are being brought in as advisers.

There are eight dimensions, including economics, regulations, agriculture, industrial policy – and the legal system. “They are throwing hundreds of their best intellectuals at this. This is very remote from anything that is going on anywhere in the world.”

Planning horizon

The leadership in China is well aware that its own power may not extend out of the major cities – with the popular saying ‘yes, but the Emperor is rivers and mountains away’. So they are leveraging change by rewiring the legal system and giving populations on the ground new legal enfranchisement.

James has been working with the higher echelons of Chinese society to fundamentally transform how the law operates. Here too, the citizen (or community) is cast as hero, not the lawyer, or the leader, or the corporation.

It feels almost uncomfortable to write anything positive about China when the human rights abuses are shocking, including its treatment of journalists. James is not naive about China. He understands concerns in the US and the UK about the development of this global power. He cites for example the fact that only China rivals the US in the development of artificial intelligence. He is also acutely aware of the issues around what we understand as human rights. “What China is up to in some regards – I can understand people being concerned about.”

Permits which allow companies to operate are now being drafted by lawyers so that companies can be sued for damaging the environment. For the first time Chinese citizens are now empowered and actively encouraged to sue companies – and local governments.

ClientEarth has been providing advice to the Supreme Court in China so NGOs can sue polluting companies. It has also been training prosecutors – and judges – to work on this novel environmental legislation. “We now every year have training for hundreds of Chinese judges, bringing global experts on legal decisions. This is fundamental. It is a highly intentional shift,” he argued.

“When you speak to senior officials, they say, ‘we are very clear that we have polluted air, soil, food that is already affecting the economy – we intend to still be here in 2,000 years with healthy people, healthy economy, healthy environment. We have a long planning horizon, and we need to be addressing these issues immediately. We think we also have to get the people involved – because the people are also very angry. We are trying to root out corruption in the system, if we allow NGOs and prosecution to be allowed in enforcement we will have a different regime’. I can only applaud this.

Mobilising citizens

“We have been working with them in a dedicated way now for seven years to build a regime of enforcing the law. It’s a fascinating inquiry. What do we need now so that every company in China knows that there are laws – because there are – saying there needs to be pollution control, and every company knows they are not allowed to ignore them, because in the past they were allowed to ignore them. This is a big shift. You get a different world.”

The threat of climate breakdown confronts each and every person on this planet, as does the collapse in biodiversity and the continued industrial pollution of both urban and rural landscapes. Every community, every nation, needs to respond in the same way.

James has been able to mobilise a positive and effective response to these threats, and has learned some important lessons along the way. The single most important for me is that it is you and I -citizens and communities – that can and will affect change. Corporations and governments will only act when we force them to. James has shown that this remains possible.

Canada’s economic growth is actually a cause for concern

When the Canadian economy surpassed expectations for April 2019 by growing 0.3%, it was met with both concern and celebration.

Media reports applauded the first quarter figures. Bloomberg reported: “Canada recorded a second strong month of growth in April, driven by rebounding oil output that is returning the nation’s economy to a more solid footing.”

While CBC quoted TD senior economist Brian DePatto, who in a letter to his clients wrote: "Thank goodness for energy. Without the surge of activity in that sector, driven by the easing of production restrictions, this would have been a much more modest report."

Yet this positive narrative veils the bleaker reality of an economy dependent on oil, mining, and gas sectors: the largest emitters of carbon dioxide.

Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction increased by 4.5% in April, while oil sands extraction increased by 11%.

According to Statistics Canada’s 2018 annual review, Canadian production of crude oil increased by 8.5% from 2017 to 2018. Similarly, the production of “marketable natural gas” increased by 3.9% in that same period.

Canadian oil exports to the United States also significantly contributed to the growth figures. Statistics Canada reveals that “Canada exported 211.9 million cubic meters of crude oil and equivalent products in 2018 [up by 10% from 2017], which represented 80.1% of total production. Exports via pipelines to the United States [up by 5.3% from 2017] was the primary contributor to the overall increase.”

This economic growth piggybacking on the extraction of crude oil, oil sands, mining and gas contradicts Canada’s effort to peg itself as a global leader in combating climate change.

Dale Marshall, National Program Manager at Environmental Defence and lead writer of the 2018 report ‘Canada’s Oil and Gas Challenge’, believes the international community sees the reality behind Canada’s growth: “over the last few years, Canada’s shine has come off the global diplomacy scale. Canada’s oil is some of the dirtiest in the world and has gradually become dirtier.”

In terms of achieving a sustainable transition, Marshall maintains that export revenue is “more difficult to replace.” Yet if a just transition strategy is mapped out now, keeping in mind the needs of workers and communities involved in the fossil fuel industry, “short-term shocks can be avoided.”

The irony behind Canada’s promise to actively curb the climate crisis and its actual actions cannot be missed. At the time of his election in 2015, Justin Trudeau took a strong stand against feeble goals to address the climate crisis. However when the Liberal government came to power, it eventually subscribed to a 30% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 – the same goal as the previous Conservative government under the leadership of Stephen Harper.

In an email exchange, the official spokesperson for Environment and Climate Change Canada, Samantha Bayard, wrote: “Canada is putting in place policies right now that will show significant impact in the coming years, policies such as reducing methane emissions from the oil and gas industry by up to 45% below 2012 levels by 2025, investing in public transit projects across the country, providing consumer rebates for electric vehicles with a goal that by 2030, 30% of all new vehicles sold in Canada will be zero-emission (and 100% by 2040).”

Yet in order to meet its 2030 goals under the Paris Agreement, Canada needs to cut its current emissions targets in half. According to Marshall, this means a 37% reduction in Canadian oil production and a 25% decline in gas production.

If Canada wants to present itself as a leader in renewable energy, Trudeau needs to realise that tackling the climate crisis requires terminating fossil fuel production.

In fact, alternative and sustainable forms of energy are increasingly viable, as the recent expansion within this sector suggests.

According to Clean Energy Canada’s 2019 report, ‘Missing the Bigger Picture’, Canada’s clean energy sector expanded 4.8% annually from 2010 to 2017. While in 2017 alone, the clean energy sector created 298,000 jobs.

Climate change is the greatest existential threat of our time. Fossil fuel production at its current rate runs the risk of economic, social and political chaos. Therefore, the Canadian government must abandon fossil fuel production in the name of economic growth, and pursue a truly green and sustainable future.

Canada is due for a general election on October 21st. The electorate has a duty to pressure government leaders and demand policy changes to not just slow fossil fuel production, but halt it altogether.

Click Here: toulon rugby shop melbourne

Displacement on the river Paraná in Paraguay

“We were very happy when we lived on the banks of the Paraná River. We had our houses, we had our animals and our mint crops, which we sold on the Brazilian side of the river”, says Carmen Martínez.

With notable melancholy, the 84-year-old says that she does not know how to begin talking about her countless memories of her former home in the east of Paraguay alongside the Paraná—one of South America’s great waterways—and of the hardships she has faced since her indigenous community, Tekoha Sauce, was forced to leave it during the construction of the immense Itaipú Dam in 1982.

Carmen is sat on a plastic chair by the side of a dirt track. On one side of this narrow road is a seemingly endless field used for large-scale commercial agriculture. On the other side is the Limoy nature reserve—a 13.3 km2 area of dense forest administered by Itaipú Binacional, an institution owned and run jointly by the Paraguayan and Brazilian states that is also responsible for the Itaipú Dam. This thin strip of land between the two contrasting landscapes is, at present, the temporary home of the 43 families that make up Tekoha Sauce.

By Carmen’s side is her granddaughter Amada Martínez, a community leader. Amada explains that Tekoha Sauce is just one of many indigenous groups—all belonging to the Ava Guaraní nation—that were forcibly evicted from their ancestral lands in eastern Paraguay during the construction of Itaipú.

Now, Martínez states, Tekoha Sauce are engaged in a legal struggle to recover their lost land whilst also facing the dire threat of a second eviction at the hands of Itaipú Binacional: this time from their current temporary settlement at Limoy.

Click Here: toulon rugby shop melbourne

Progress at what cost?

The Itaipú Hydroelectric Plant was built as a joint project by the Paraguayan and Brazilian states—both then controlled by military dictatorships—over the period 1973-84.

This symbol of progress was constructed on the Paraná River, which marks the shared border between the two countries, and, at the time, was to be the planet’s largest hydro plant (at present, it is the second largest in the world in terms of capacity—after the Three Gorges in China—but retains its title as the hydroelectric facility with highest energy production).

Within the frame of this unprecedented engineering project, the Paraguayan government expropriated an area of 1650 km2. This included space to accommodate part of the plant’s enormous new reservoir lake, which covers a total of 144 km2 across the two countries, so large that it has changed the map of South America, and roughly 100 km2 for the creation of nature reserves.

Mariblanca Barón, a researcher who has written about the impact of Itaipú on the Ava Guaraní, claims that 38 indigenous communities, consisting of approximately 688 families, were forced from their ancestral lands along the Paraguayan side of the Paraná as a result of the expropriation.

She condemns this action for its violation of international treaties and Paraguayan law, which both state that indigenous peoples must consent to any move and must be given land of at least comparable quality to that being left behind.

In her book, Los Ava Guaraní Paranaenses, Barón demonstrates that irregularities took place from the very beginning of this process of eviction. A survey commissioned by Itaipú Binacional in 1977, which was used to coordinate the removal of the indigenous peoples, was completely lacking in documentation about the inhabitants of the area and in provisions for their relocation.

The prominent anthropologist Bartomeu Melià, one of the three academics that carried out the report, himself subsequently denounced it as being a very short, half-baked document (‘muy a medias lo hicimos’) that, contrary to Itaipú Binacional’s stance, cannot be used to justify the transfer of the Ava Guaraní.

On the Brazilian side of the border, a recently released report commissioned by the country’s Public Prosecutor’s Office states that the rights of Guaraní groups living in Brazil were also severely violated during the construction of Itaipú. No such report has been carried out by the Paraguayan state.

A community uprooted

The violations of the rights of the indigenous communities in Paraguay can be clearly seen in the case of Tekoha Sauce. Carmen Martínez says that they were notified that the rising waters of the new reservoir would completely flood their ancestral territory and that they were then moved, along with members of several other communities, to an area that the state had selected for their relocation.

She claims that this new location, Jekyry, was entirely inappropriate for their needs. There were no wild animals for them to hunt and there was no river.

Quite apart from the importance of fishing for their subsistence, contact with the Paraná, going back countless generations, had produced an important spiritual relationship with water; it was impossible to maintain this relationship in Jekyry. Carmen says that soon after being relocated, many members of the community died of sadness: “We lost everything: our land, our houses and our way of living”.

Describing the experience of her parents and grandparents, Amada adds, “The community was never consulted about whether they wanted to go there. They just took them there by force and, as they had no other option, they stayed”.

The young leader states that the fact that the indigenous groups did not have deeds to the land has played against them: “It was state-owned land. Back then you didn’t need to have deeds; you owned the land by living on it. The indigenous groups had always been there. It had always been indigenous land.”

“Before, we trusted in people’s word; it was the most important thing there was. Now, we Guaraní have learnt how important papers are”.

With the support of a coalition of local and international NGOs Tekoha Sauce have become the first of the 38 communities displaced by Itaipú Binacional to embark on a legal battle to recover their lost territory or be given suitable replacement land.

In response to these claims, Itaipú Binacional denies any wrongdoing (this has also been the institution’s reaction to recriminations contained within the report commissioned by the Brazilian Public Prosecutor’s Office). In a letter sent to the Paraguayan Senate in May 2019, it contends that it fulfilled its legal obligations when it relocated members of Tekoha Sauce back in 1982.

Lucía Sandoval, one of a team of lawyers representing the community, disputes this view. She claims that the extremely poor quality of the terrain to which Tekoha Sauce were taken violates the law: “The state was obliged to provide them with land of equal quality to that which they previously inhabited so that they could continue living there as families and continue practising their culture without sacrificing their traditions. That’s what Law 904 states, and in no way did the manner that they were treated correspond to that”.

Tekoha Sauce’s legal team is currently awaiting the final decision of Paraguayan authorities. If a favourable decision is not obtained, they plan to take the case to the Interamerican Court of Human Rights (IACHR).

Leti Galeano, leader of the coalition of NGOs supporting the community, says that “The case meets all the legal requirements to go to the Interamerican Court. First, we’ll use up all the options here in Paraguay, but we already know that nothing gets solved here. It’s almost time to take the case to the international bodies”.

In recent years, three indigenous communities in other parts of Paraguay have seen land disputes with the state decided in their favour by the IACHR.

Tekohá Sauce is one of many indigenous communities facing land-ownership problems in Paraguay. The United Nation’s Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, has written about this worrying situation. She states that, of the almost 500 indigenous communities in the country, 134 are landless and 145 are experiencing problems related to land possession, such as conflicts with the state or private businesses.

The territory is not below water

The struggle of members of Tekoha Sauce to return to their home on the banks of the Paraná long predates the current legal battle. Amada recounts that “Since I was a little girl, I’ve heard the stories about what happened. The people of Sauce never stopped belonging to that place”.

She mentions that members of the community frequently returned to the area, and that through these trips they discovered that their territory had not been flooded in its entirety as Itaipú Binacional had told them. They found that part of their land had been designated as part of a nature reserve—they were able to find their old graveyard within this reserve—and another large section is now owned and cultivated by a soya farmer.

This irregular transfer of land is not surprising. During the dictatorship of Alfredo Stroessner—which lasted from 1954 to 1989—6,744 km2 of state-owned land were granted unlawfully to friends and allies of the military regime.

Although it has not been possible to ascertain how Tekoha Sauce’s land ended up in the hands of a commercial farmer, many similar cases took place with complicity from authorities. The Paraguayan newspaper Última Hora is currently publishing a series of articles about the illegal use of vast swathes of the land expropiated during the construction of Itaipú.

Armed with this information, in 2015, the community decided to take action. Under the leadership of Amada and her father Cristóbal Martínez, they returned to their former home. A large group of families entered the soya plantation and began to build their homes.

This occupation was to be short lived: in September 2016, a court ordered the removal of the indigenous group. An eviction force consisting of mounted police, paid workers and representatives of the National Institute for Indigenous Affairs (INDI)—the very institution supposedly charged with defending the interests of Paraguay’s indigenous peoples—were present for a violent destruction of the Tekoha Sauce settlement. Their houses were burnt down, and their animals taken and killed, according to members of the community.

The Tekoha Sauce legal team claims that this eviction was illegal due to the lack of notification given to the community—they are currently appealing for the court order that permitted the eviction to be declared void.

The support given by the Paraguayan state to the soya farmer, at the cost of the indigenous community, forms part of a historic trend. As Luis Rojas, a researcher in rural development, mentions, in Paraguay—the country with the highest level of inequality of land ownership in the world, according to the World Bank—laws, taxes and judicial decisions tend to work in favour of the powerful, landed class and against indigenous and smallholder-farmer groups.

“We are here because we have nowhere else to go”

Following this violent eviction, Amada claims that Tekoha Sauce saw no other option than to move to their current position on the edge of the Limoy nature reserve, just a few kilometres from their former territory.

Leti Galeano mentions that the community has made it clear that they are only occupying this tiny space out of necessity whilst continuing the legal battle for the recuperation of their own land. However, Itaipú Binacional, which administers the reserve, has denounced the community as unwanted invaders, stating that they pose a threat to protected wildlife.

Itaipú Binacional, whilst refusing to hold talks with the indigenous families about the loss of their lands in 1982, is now actively pursuing the eviction of the community from their current location at Limoy. The institution has already pushed a measure through the courts that prohibits members of the community from hunting, fishing, building new houses and from using wood from the reserve.

Margarita Heralasky, a member of the community’s legal team, states that this action puts the human rights of the families of Tekoha Sauce in danger as “It prohibits them from carrying out any activities, even including those necessary for their own subsistence”.

The discovery that Itaipú Binacional is pursuing an eviction order prompted Amnesty International to release an urgent action appeal on 2nd July, calling for activists to write letters to petition Paraguayan President Mario Abdo Benítez to intervene.

Fighting a giant

The 43 families of Tekoha Sauce are confronting the power of the parastatal body responsible for the world’s second biggest hydroelectric dam on two fronts.

They continue to push for Itaipú Binacional to compensate them adequately for the extreme violation of rights that separated them from their home by the River Paraná whilst also resisting eviction from their temporary home at Limoy.

Leti Galeano says that the extreme persecution experienced by Tekoha Sauce could be a sign that Itaipú Binacional is afraid: if the indigenous families manage to recover their territory, it could set a precedent for the recuperation of land for some of the other 37 communities that were evicted during the construction of the dam, each with their own story of suffering and injustice.

Ethio-Lebanese corpse disposal inc.

Translations and additional reporting from Bileh Jelan.

“She loved life and she loved her family,” Tigist Tafesse says while fighting back tears when asked to describe her late sister Desta. “All she wanted to do was earn enough money to cover her younger brother’s schooling expenses. She didn’t deserve this. Nobody deserves this.”

Tigist’s younger sister Desta, 26, had left her native Ethiopia in search of employment as a domestic worker in Lebanon. It’s a route that many young Ethiopian women take in search of income that could potentially revamp the livelihoods of impoverished families back home. Hundreds of thousands of Ethiopians have flocked to the Middle East over the past decade, with choice destinations being Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. And while some do manage to earn a living and send valuable remittances to loved ones in Ethiopia, an increasing number of them are instead entrapped in a cycle of isolation, endless unpaid toiling, food deprivation, horrific abuse and all too often, death.

It was the tragic fate of Desta, who had spent over a year at the home of a Lebanese couple in the city of Byblos, some 30 kilometers north of Beirut. Over the course of the last one year, Tigist says her sister was never allowed to leave the premises and was subjected to ghastly abuse.

“They burnt her, beat her and kept her as a slave all this time,” Tigist laments. “I tried everything I could to rescue her.”

Desta Tafesse Bedhane. Her ordeal just prior to her death was particularly distressing (Images: Tigist Tafesse)

Tigist contacted nearby friends in a desperate attempt to hatch an escape plot. She had initially attempted to solicit the aid of a worker’s rights organization in Lebanon, but Desta had begged her not to. She feared that doing so would enrage her captors and result in brutal repercussions for her.

The Ethiopian government maintains a consulate in the capital Beirut. Despite a mandate that would call for Ethiopia’s consular staff to keep tabs on the wellbeing of fellow citizens, they systematically ignore complaints and turn a blind eye to some of the most harrowing reports of abuse. Addis Standard has been able to include in this article several recent, documented incidents of Ethiopian consular officials doing nothing to pursue justice, even in cases where there was evidence pointing to deceased Ethiopians being victims of a variety of abuses and perhaps murder.

Like many Ethiopians Desta Tafesse was left to fend for herself. Her older sister Tigist, herself a domestic worker in the Middle East, was left helpless in the months preceding Desta’s death.

After all, she was all too aware of the limitations someone in Desta’s shoes faced. Foreign domestic workers in this part of the world, like Tigist and Desta, don’t enjoy the same employees’ rights and freedoms guaranteed to citizens under most constitutions. In Lebanon, their protections, rights and status as domestic workers are governed by a system known as the kafala system.

The kafala system ties a foreign worker’s legal status to their employers and puts the workers under the total control of the employers. Slated as a method to ensure foreign workers have local residents overseeing their status and employment, it has served to legitimize virtual slavery, as employers are given carte blanche to exploit their employee unchecked. The kafala system is what grants an employer the right to take away an employee’s travel documents, withhold pay and subject them to countless hours of work with no rest. Unlike Lebanese labor laws, the kafala system has no charter guaranteeing the safety and wellbeing of domestic workers, opening the door to all sorts of horrific treatment against workers. A domestic worker is also unable to flee an abusive home. Addis Standard has been made aware of several cases where Ethiopian domestic workers, hospitalized after suffering the effects of torture and beatings, were made to return to the same home where they had been subjected to their ordeals.

It is due to her extremely vulnerable status under the kafala system that Desta experienced the indignities that would later end in her untimely death on May 12, after toiling for 14 months without a pay. It is also due to the kafala system that her death is unlikely to ever be considered worthy of a Lebanese police investigation that would likely result in her employers facing criminal charges.

The Lebanese government regularly issues half-hearted pledges to improve the situation of domestic workers, but has always rebuffed criticism of the kafala system. In an interview this year with Thomson Reuters, Lebanese Minister of Labor Georges Ayda insisted that the kafala system was essential to protecting employers. “You are putting a stranger within a family,” was how he described the employment of domestic workers in Lebanese homes. “When they work in houses there has to be somebody that is responsible for them.”

But human rights activists reject the notion that the law is used for anything other than a pretext to justify modern day slavery. In April of this year, rights group Amnesty International released a report titled “Their house is my prison” that highlighted not only the extent of some of the abuses, but also how the kafala system serves to keep at-risk workers pinned down with no escape. According to the report, a domestic worker needs to go through a lengthy documentation process with the employer’s consent to be able to leave a job, no matter how dire the working conditions are. “The employer has to sign a release form before a public notary and the new sponsor then needs to sign a notarized pledge to assume all responsibilities and obligations toward the worker. If the worker leaves her employer without permission, she risks losing her regular migration status and facing detention and deportation.”

Ethiopian migrant workers in Beirut hold a demonstration calling for the inclusion of migrant workers in the labor law, May 2019 (Image: Social Media)

To many, it remains a mystery exactly how Lebanon’s relatively conservative society was able to normalize and institutionalize these abuses with little domestic opposition. But Alli Finn, a representative of the Beirut based Migrant Community Center and Anti-Racism Movement, points out that shortcomings in the kafala system are what have proven most problematic. The kafala system’s granting of near omnipotent control over all aspects of a worker’s life, combined with the narrative that the system serves to protect the worker, is what opens the doors to violations and exploitation.

“It isn’t a cultural thing.” Finn dismissed the notion that such abuses might be born of something embedded in Lebanese society. “The main problem is the kafala system itself and that Lebanese law excludes domestic workers. The system’s proponents often claim that the enforcement of the system is to protect the migrant worker and employer. The rhetoric of “protection” is especially problematic because it is then used to justify any sort of treatment a worker could be subjected to, such as keeping a worker locked in the house, ostensibly and falsely to ‘keep her safe,’” Finn said. “Employers often refer to a domestic worker as ‘part of our family,’ which serves to diminish both her rights as a worker and her ability to pursue justice afterwards. The reality is that this rhetoric is used to exploit migrant workers, especially women.”

But Lebanese American law professor and author Khaled A Beydoun disagrees. In an op-ed penned for Al Jazeera back in 2012, he described culturally entrenched racism in Lebanese society as being what aggravates the situation. “An unsavory blend of Lebanese ethnocentrism, racial animus toward Africans, human trafficking and the debt bondage of maids upon arrival from Ethiopia, make up a recipe for contemporary enslavement,” was how Beydoun put it.

There are around 300,000 foreign domestic workers employed across Lebanon, with around three quarters of them Ethiopian women. Reports of Ethiopian domestic workers being enslaved, raped and murdered in that country have made the rounds for well over a decade now. In response to the public outcry at home, the Ethiopian government banned its citizens from traveling to work in Lebanon, citing the dangers of doing so. Addis Abeba maintains that until it reaches an agreement with the government of Lebanon securing the rights and dignity of Ethiopian citizens in the country, it will not lift the ban. But thousands have defied, and continue to defy, the ban while recruitment agencies, some based in Addis Abeba, continue to operate and traffic women towards the life of uncertainty that the job search in Lebanon encompasses.

The allure remains strong, despite the risks. “There are no jobs back home,” says one such woman, a 22 year old who tells Addis Standard she was 19 when she traveled to Beirut. She worked for six months without pay in the home of a family in Beirut before managing to get her passport and escape. She requested anonymity as she fears she could be caught and deported if identified. “I’m putting myself at risk just by searching for a job here, but what else can I do? My family has no other source of income and I have four younger siblings who count on me. There are no opportunities to return to in Ethiopia.”

Clearly bans have not had the desired effect. With employment opportunities few and far between in Ethiopia, women continue to flock towards the Middle East, well aware of the risk they are taking. There are more Ethiopians working in Lebanon today than there were when the Ethiopian government issued the first of such bans in 2008. The futility of such bans is especially evident when one takes note of the fact that cases of abuse have skyrocketed. Deaths and suicides have also seen a steady increase.

“Two foreign nationals employed as domestic workers in Lebanon die every week in that country,” says Sara, an Ethiopian activist and case worker with the Canada based “This is Lebanon” organization, a lobbyist group for abused and enslaved domestic workers in Lebanon. Modus operandi includes contacting abusers and threatening to expose their abuses on the group’s Facebook page. The threat of being exposed is often enough to convince abusive employers to release their workers and pay up owed salaries. This Is Lebanon has managed to free a number of women using such methods whilst arranging for their former employers to pay them in full. Those who don’t, end up like the family of Eleanore Ajami, a Lebanese fashion executive and owner of the renowned Eleanore Couture brand. In 2018, after This Is Lebanon published the story of her family’s abuse of 20 year old Ethiopian Lensa Lelisa on their webpage, media outlets around the world carried the story, boycotts of Eleanore Couture were announced and the family’s image was severely tarnished. The backlash worked; Lensa was allowed to return to her family in Ethiopia.

Sara remains anonymous so as to not compromise colleagues and contacts, and reveals little about herself apart from being Ethiopian and a former domestic worker in Lebanon. The efforts of Sara and likeminded activists in the country has long provoked the ire of the establishment. The Lebanese government attempted to block This Is Lebanon’s webpage from being accessed in the country this year and members of the group operating out of Lebanon risk being jailed or worse if positively identified. But Sara maintains that she and her colleagues have no alternative to pursuing this sort of action. “We have resorted to these methods because we cannot stomach the continuous abuse and murder,” she says. “The Lebanese government deems domestic workers as being less than humans. Employers are never caught and brought to trial. The Ethiopian consulate in Beirut meanwhile doesn’t care in the slightest about its citizens, no matter how many of our women die. It is complicit in the abuse.”

It’s a serious accusation that Ethiopian embassies and consulates across the Middle East have faced for years. Diplomats posted in these countries are slammed for doing little when complaints and calls for help pile up in the form of phone calls and/or messages via social media. To counter this narrative, the Ethiopian Consulate in Lebanon has started using its official Facebook page to post alleged incidents of consular intervention resulting in the successful rescue of maids from abusive homes or of unpaid salary being recuperated. Last month, in a Facebook posting, the Consulate claimed to have collected 5,700 US$ in unpaid salaries on behalf of three Ethiopian workers. The claim is impossible to verify and the brief statement provides no additional details.

However, a far greater number of cases remain on the Ethiopian consular back burner.

In the event of Ethiopians suffering grievous bodily harm and dying, the standard procedure appears to be collecting the body and shipping it back to relatives in Ethiopia. Even with ample evidence of criminal wrongdoing, as in the case of Desta Tafesse, Ethiopian consular officials rarely, if ever, resort to take firm legal actions in the pursuit of justice.

The tragic death of Mulu Tilaye Tekle is one of many such examples. Mulu died in April of this year, trying to escape from the home where she was imprisoned. It’s the fate of all too many a foreign domestic workers.

Mulu Tilaye’s passport

Mulu was born in the rural Amhara region’s North Shewa zone. She had barely turned 20 when she arrived in Lebanon in 2017, eager to find work that would help support her family back home. Her older sister, Zenebech, had made the trip before her and had a consistent source of income based in a home in Beirut. Mulu sought to double the family’s earnings and thought the presence of her sister would render the transition to life in Lebanon easier. But it wasn’t to be. The two would never even meet. Mulu thought she had found legitimate employment when she moved into the home of Elie Kahwach, a 50 year old retired Lebanese Army officer and his wife Pauline Chahine, 41.

The couple and their two children live in an apartment on the 5th floor of a building located in the Lebanese coastal town of Jounieh. There, Mulu worked all week with no breaks. Pay was intermittent at best, before becoming a rarity altogether, says Mulu’s brother, Wolde Tilaye.

“At first she would send me money through her employers on a regular basis. Later, I wouldn’t know when she was being paid,” Wolde told Addis Standard from his home in Addis Abeba. “But before her death, she had not been paid for at least three months.”

If the lack of clarity surrounding her pay wasn’t worrying enough, the fact that she was kept a virtual prisoner in the apartment meant that the family was unable to verify if she was being abused by her employers, an extremely common occurrence. Mulu was never allowed to either leave the premises on her own or even possess a mobile phone. The latter would have permitted her to remain in regular contact with her family in Ethiopia and her sister in Lebanon. But the only time she was ever allowed to contact her family was when Elie Kahwach allowed it. He’d set her up with a VoIP app on his own phone with which she would be allowed to speak with her brother for a few minutes. Then the line would cut and that would be it. “Caller display always showed a different number. I could never call and actually reach her,”Wolde recalls. “But she always sounded fearful, frightened. She did tell me she couldn’t speak openly because the man was watching her as she spoke.”

Her sister was especially worried that something was happening to her. A year or so since her hiring, she had not once been permitted to meet with her sister. Whenever Kahwach or Chahine left the home, they always made sure to lock Mulu indoors so she couldn’t venture out. “I was able to find out from neighbors and friends that she was being regularly abused,” her sister Zenebech said. Zenebech accuses Elie Kahwach of personally meting out much of the abuse. “He used to tell her, I’m an army man. I can get away with anything.”

On April 12th of this year, it all became too much for Mulu. Desperate to escape her circumstances, she took the plunge, jumping from the balcony of the 5th floor apartment towards the concrete ground below. The fall caused numerous bone fractures and internal bleeding that made it impossible to survive. She was 21. Instead of rushing her to the hospital, onlookers gawked and took pictures of the mortally wounded young woman.

The 10 story building Mulu Tilaye was confined in and finally died trying to escape from (Image: This is Lebanon)

In an interview with local media outlet Daily Star, Elie Kahwach denied ever beating or abusing her. “This is not true, it’s not accurate and it’s shameful,” he said. “We would treat her very well, we really liked her.” Despite this, he did admit that he would regularly keep Mulu locked in the house.

Through regular contact with members of the This Is Lebanon organization and a network of activists on the ground, Addis Standard has been able to obtain the Lebanese police report into Mulu’s death. According to the report, both Kahwach and his wife Pauline Chahine denied physically abusing Mulu when questioned by police, but did admit that Mulu never had access to a phone and was virtually imprisoned in the home, locked indoors with no way of getting out. They both claimed they had no idea why Mulu would resort to jumping off a 5th floor balcony to escape the home.

Elie Kahwach, who owned the 5th floor apartment Mulu Tilaye worked in, is accused by Mulu’s family of physically assaulting her. Mulu ended up making a fatal jump off the apartment’s balcony in an attempt to escape the home (Image: Facebook)

Through an undercover collaborator Addis Standard contacted the couple after obtaining their contact information. As Mulu’s brother had alleged that the couple owed his sister three months’ pay, Pauline was first asked to respond to claims that Mulu had worked unpaid between January and April 12th. “It was Mulu’s choice,” Chahine insisted. “She took charge of her own finances. She had asked to use Western Union to send money to her parents every three months.”

It could be true that not all of the money they paid Mulu was sent to her brother Wolde and that perhaps she had chosen on several occasions to hold onto her earnings. However, Chahine’s portrayal of Mulu being in charge of her financial destiny doesn’t hold water when one recalls that the same couple banned her from using a phone or even going outdoors. Addis Standard pressed Chahine on this latter topic.

Excerpts:

Addis Standard: “Why was she never even permitted to visit her own sister who had been living in Lebanon all this time?”

Pauline Chahine: “She said nothing! We never heard about a sister living here. I was shocked! She was magnificent, we loved her. But we would have let her visit her sister if we had known!”

Elie Kahwach and his wife Pauline Chahine. In her conversation with Addis Standard, Chahine claimed that she had no idea that Mulu had a sister that wanted to visit her. A police report quotes her as admitting that she never allowed Mulu permission to leave the home (Image: Facebook)

Chahine’s claim to have had no idea of Mulu having a sister in Lebanon appears to be a blatant lie. According to the same Lebanese media report cited above, Mulu’s sister, Zenebech, went as far as pleading with the recruitment agency that sent Mulu to Chahine’s apartment. The man who runs the agency, Nidal Hashem, told the Daily Star that he contacted Pauline and Elie, notified them about the sister’s complaint and asked them to bring Mulu to his office and find another employee for them. “They refused,” he said.

Pauline Chahine admitted to having confined Mulu in a locked space 24 hours a day seven days a week. Her denial of having any knowledge of Mulu having a sister in Lebanon when available evidence suggests that this isn’t true, further dents her credibility. Addis Standard brought this up in the brief phone exchange with Chahine.

Both you and your husband admitted that Mulu was always kept within the confines of the home at all times. Why did you not once allow her to leave? Why did you turn her into a prisoner?”

At this point, Chahine became agitated and refused to answer the question, instead redirecting all inquiries to her lawyer before abruptly hanging up.

There are plenty of discrepancies between the versions of the story that Elie Kahwach and Pauline Chahine told Lebanese press and investigators and what really happened. There are grounds for a criminal case being pursued here. The Ethiopian consulate’s mandate would cover lobbying for justice and for the full truth to come out. After all, although proof of the family’s claims of abuse might be somewhat difficult to obtain, Elie Kahwach has openly admitted to committing at least one violation of the UNHCR ratified International Convention on the Protection of Migrant Workers – unlawful restraint.

The police report into Mulu’s death reveals that the Ethiopian consulate did indeed send an official to take charge of the case. The report identifies this official as being 46 year old Nigussie Bedaso Mola, whom Addis Standard learned has spent a sizeable part of his career posted in Beirut. The veteran diplomat met with a Lebanese police Warrant Chief Bilal El Ali days after Mulu’s death. Nigussie, described as being fluent in Arabic, gives a sworn statement. “I have taken necessary measures to send her remains back to Ethiopia for burial. I will also send her passport, residence permit and possessions including Lebanese and Ethiopian currency notes, as well as pictures of church saints. I’d like to confirm our legal rights to pursue justice in the case of further information emerging.”

Pages from the Lebanese police report into Mulu Tilaye’s death. These pages identify consular official Nigussie Bedaso Mola as having met with a Lebanese police chief. The document shows that Nigussie did indicate that he’d be willing to pursue a legal case if sufficient evidence of foul play was available. They are evidence that despite his later denials, he did have a mandate that includes pursuing suspected abusers of Ethiopian citizens in Lebanese court. He is not known to have taken any subsequent action. Censored here is Nigussie’s personal contact information (Image: This is Lebanon)

The last sentence confirms that Nigussie does indeed have a mandate that includes exploring legal avenues in cases where he is assigned and foul play is suspected.

However, almost three months after having given this statement, Nigussie Bedaso Mola is confirmed to have done absolutely nothing of the kind. Neither Elie Kahwach nor Pauline Chahine have been charged with any crimes. It had been over two months since Mulu’s death when Addis Standard reached the couple by phone, and they appeared surprised that anyone would call regarding the young woman who had died trying to flee their home. And Nigussie Bedaso, the diplomat in charge, is yet to speak with the family let alone hire a lawyer to pursue the truth.

“Nobody,” said Mulu’s father Tilaye Tekle, when asked by Addis Standard whether anyone from the Ethiopian Consulate or government had contacted him about his late daughter. “No we are alone as a family carrying the burden of this loss.”

Addis Standard tried to contact the consulate office about Nigussie’s inactivity regarding Mulu’s death on several occasions. Despite the secretary at the main desk answering the phone and promising to connect the line with Nigussie’s office, the call would end moments later. Nigussie proved to be elusive when contacted via official consular phone lines. After it became clear that using the office numbers was futile, Addis Standard obtained his personal cellular phone number. After several unsuccessful attempts to reach him, he was sent a text on the popular voice call and messaging app WhatsApp asking him to explain why, despite his being tasked with overseeing post mortem procedures in the case of Mulu Tilaye and despite his confirming that he was interested in a potential legal case, he had done nothing whatsoever in the two months or so since Mulu died.His response? “What do you mean I didn’t call the family? How were we able to send the remains home without contacting the family?” When asked whether he believed his responsibilities were limited to sending coffins home, he answers: “What I know is that the body has been sent home.” He then replied with a picture containing private contact information of someone who appeared to be one of Mulu’s siblings. “We even sent the coroner’s report with the body. Besides, you shouldn’t be contacting me, but the main office.”

When reminded that it was him who was put in charge of the case and that any responsibilities that would see Pauline Chahine and Elie Kahwach appear in court for abuse and contributing to the death of a 21 year old Ethiopian citizen would be his, Nigussie stopped responding. From his responses, it’s clear that he found it inconceivable that one would have expectations of him that go beyond sending her remains home.

His reluctance to act has resulted in Elie Kahwach joining the ranks of Lebanese employers suspected of inflicting horrendous abuse on Ethiopian domestic workers and receiving nothing more than a slap on the wrist. He is among several located in Jounieh, a place where Ethiopians appear to be dying regularly.

The death of another Ethiopian worker, Tigist Belay Tadesse preceded Mulu’s by about three months.Like Mulu, Tigist also worked in the home of a family in Jounieh. She died on February 2nd of this year. Her death was said to be a suicide. She was only 19. Hailing from North Wollo zone of the Amhara regional state, Tigist left her home to follow in the paths of family members who were already in the Middle East and sending remittances home. Tragically, she would never make it home. Her family refuses to accept the official explanation for her death.

Tigist Belay was only 19 years old when she died in February of this year in Jounieh, Lebanon (Image: Amare Belay)

Her brother, Amare Belay, says that Tigist was regularly beaten and abused by her employers. He personally believes that his sister was murdered. “At first things were ok. I spoke to her regularly and she told me she was getting by,” Amare explains, “but then they started withholding her pay. When she asked her employers about her salary, they would beat her.”Amare says he last heard from his sister on January 31st when he says Tigist, terrified, told him she feared for her life.

“She told me, ‘They are going to kill me. I don’t think I’ll make it out of here alive.’ I tried to comfort her, told her to stop saying this,” Amare said between bouts of sobbing.“Three days later, I heard that she was dead.”

Tigist worked in the home of 58 year old retired Lebanese Red Cross employee Elias Milad Sa’ab. Like many of her fellow nationals, she was deprived of regular contact with her relatives and was only allowed to contact family while being observed closely by an employer’s daughter, Leda Sa’ab. Tigist’s older sister, Emebet Belay, would reach out to Leda Sa’ab on WhatsApp when she wanted to see how her little sister was doing. Leda sometimes responded by putting her through to Tigist and the sisters would converse briefly. Then one day, hearing disturbing news and fearing the worst, Emebet Belay frantically contacted Leda for info on the wellbeing of her younger sister. But Leda replied to her with a voice message on Whatsapp that Addis Standard can confirm came from a device registered to Leda’s name. In a cold, hostile tone lacking any sympathy, Leda responded to Emebet one last time. “Don’t call this number again,”she begins by warning.“We cared for Tigist and treated her like family. She suddenly decided to drink a cleaning agent and kill herself. This is not our problem. Don’t call us again.”After sending this message, Leda blocked Emebet from responding to her on WhatsApp.

Leda Sa’ab told Emebet Belay that her younger sister had drank poison and committed suicide, before backtracking in a recent conversation with Addis Standard and claiming she didn’t know how Tigist lost her life

But Emebet doesn’t buy this explanation. She is adamant that her little sister didn’t commit suicide. “They murdered her. My sister had her whole life ahead of her and family to go home to. She had no reason to want to end her life,” she said.

Tigist’s youthful playfulness, was such that she was especially fond of snow, something she saw for the first time in her life when she arrived in Lebanon (Image: Emebet Belay)

Emebet says that things at the Sa’ab home had initially started well for Tigist. She was paid on time and cared for Elias’ ex-wife, who suffers from cancer. Sometime into her employment in the home, both Elias and his son began physically abusing Tigist, Emebet says. Tigist relayed her plight under her breath, in her native Amharic during the odd phone conversation she would be permitted to have with her siblings.

“She told me that the son used to kick her in the abdomen and insult her. The father was abusive too. I told her to try to find a new employer,” Emebet said.

Emebet further explained that things deteriorated when one day, Tigist was given the phone to call her sister but instead called her recruitment agency to complain of abuse at the hand of the Sa’ab family. “This happened around September [2018],” Emebet recalls. “After they found that out, things worsened. We heard from her less and less. She lost her regular phone privileges. I believe the abuse got worse and worse. They also stopped paying her. Then suddenly I received the voice message saying that she had poisoned herself.”

Despite working uninterrupted for the last six months of her life, Tigist didn’t receive a penny in salary for the final three months. This Is Lebanon affiliated activists obtained the Lebanese police report into Tigist’s death. The Arabic language report itself highlights numerous inconsistencies and Leda’s father Elias Milad Sa’ab, who was interviewed by police, makes several contradictory statements.

He gave investigators a fake phone number and refused to identify his place of employment. When asked about Tigist’s death, he initially told the police that the young woman had hanged herself in her bedroom. But in the same interview some time later, he states that he found Tigist hanging from the balcony. Both contradict what his daughter Leda told Tigist’s family when she sent the audio message claiming Tigist had poisoned herself. This is documented proof of family members giving various contradictory versions of Tigist’s death. An autopsy report later conducted at Addis Abeba’s St Paul Hospital confirms that Tigist had a neck wound suggesting that she died after blood circulation was cut off to her head, but stopped short of declaring a cause of death. The autopsy report’s findings could mean Tigist’s death could have been a result of anything from self-inflicted wounds to strangulation at the hands of someone else.

Sections of the Lebanese police report into the death of Ethiopian citizen Tigist Belay Tadesse. These pages include statements given by Elias Milad Sa’ab during his questioning by police. Encircled in white, two separate segments of the same document showing that he made conflicting statements about where Tigist’s body was found (Image: This is Lebanon)

We contacted Leda Sa’ab to inquire as to what pushed her to send the audio recording in which she notified Emebet of her younger sister’s death. Both the coroner’s report and an autopsy made no mention of a poisoning, but in the recording, Leda affirmed this was the cause of Tigist’s alleged suicide. Leda’s allegation was made prior to her father telling Lebanese police that Tigist had actually hanged herself to death.

Leda was reached by phone, as was the case with Elie Kahwach and Pauline Chahine, via an undercover collaborator. Leda Sa’ab was briefly questioned about the Ethiopian maid who used to work in her home. She appeared startled that someone would call her about Tigist. “We don’t have any Ethiopian woman working in our home,” she initially spurted out.

Excerpts:

Addis Standard: Yes, I know there’s no one now, but previously there had been one who passed away in February, yes?

Leda Sa’ab: Yes and what about her?

Addis Standard: We are in possession of an audio clip in which you are heard telling her sister Emebet that she died after consuming poison…

Leda Sa’ab: Yes, she is dead, but I don’t know how she died. Stop talking to me now.

Leda abruptly hung up the phone at this point. Five months after telling Emebet Belay that her sister had drunk a chemical to end her life, she changed her story and said that she had no idea how her death occurred. Five months after her father told investigators that Tigist had hung herself, Leda feigned total ignorance about the tragedy.

Elias Milad Sa’ab wouldn’t answer phone calls despite repeated attempts to reach him. Upon receiving multiple requests for an interview via the Viber VoIP calling app, he resorted to blocking phone numbers

Former Lebanese Red Cross member Elias Milad Sa’ab may have saved lives as an ambulance driver, but he could not prevent the death of Tigist Belay Tadesse in the home he owned (Image: Facebook)

It is these inconsistencies that point to the Sa’ab family hiding important details that could potentially incriminate them in the 19 year old Ethiopian’s death. If anything, a court case could commence based solely on the fact that Tigist had toiled endlessly for every single day between November 2018 and January 2019 and received no financial compensation for it. But Ethiopian consular officials appear unwilling to accept that probing the deaths of their own citizens is part of their job description let alone hire a lawyer to investigate the case.

Alli Finn of the Beirut based Migrant Community Center and Anti-Racism Movement explains that the consulate has considerable power, when it wields it. “Yes, due to it being a diplomatic entity it has a clout with Lebanese authorities and employers. Activists work with the consulate in Beirut and have recorded successes in some cases. However, at times it feels as though we have to really push them to solicit any sort of involvement on their behalf.”

The above document is an official letter sent by a consular official named Samson Abebe Telila requesting assistance in returning Tigist’s remains and possessions to her family in Ethiopia. Signed and stamped, it indicates that Samson Abebe Telila was the consulate’s man on the case and thus responsible for any additional maneuvers including legal action. He could then provide answers for the lack of it since there is no evidence anything had been done to obtain answers.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

But, like Nigussie Bedaso Mola, Samson Abebe Telila too proved very difficult to contact and unwilling to pick up phone calls.

After formal avenues for reaching him were exhausted, we used WhatsApp to send him a lengthy inquisitive text message. When questioned as to why five months later, absolutely no action was taken to investigate the family who are likely to be implicated for Tigist’s misery, Samson took offense and instead appeared irritated by the fact that his personal number was traced. “I’m a lower level employee, your questions should be directed to the head of the mission,” he wrote. “You shouldn’t be sending messages to private phones.” This he said despite it being clarified to him that previous repeated attempts to contact him through the numbers listed on the consulate’s Facebook page were unsuccessful. “There are a lot of things the family can do. They can collect recordings and other evidence, but they’d have to go to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, not us.”

Samson would also not clarify what exactly it was that he was tasked with and reiterated that we take up the issue with the head of the mission.

The unwillingness of Ethiopian consular officials in Beirut and the Lebanese authorities to investigate a growing number of suspicious deaths of Ethiopian workers points to a combined effort – knowingly or otherwise – to make sure that the plights of helpless Ethiopians are not widely heard.

The Lebanese government remains unflinching in its position on the kafala law and thus more of such deaths can be expected. Further emboldening the abusers and murderers of these women is the fact that Lebanese police and Beirut based Ethiopian consular staff appear fixated on one and one thing only, disposing of the body. Addis Standard has examined over a dozen cases of Ethiopian domestic workers’ deaths in 2019. In most cases, Lebanese police interview employers and witnesses and obtain the coroner’s report. But no one is ever arrested or brought to a trial. With the Ethiopian consulate, an appointed envoy is dispatched to ensure the remains, passport and other possessions are sent to relatives, before returning to the desk job.

Ambassador Mohammed Berihu, head of the mission to Lebanon denied allegations that the embassy refuses to engage with citizens. When contacted, he too appeared unhappy to have been reached via his personal number. “Our doors are open. So are our phone lines. We can be reached if contacted,” he said. But the call to the ambassador’s private number was made after several calls to the consulate went unanswered. When this was pointed out, the ambassador appeared to become agitated. “If you are in Addis Abeba, contact consular assistance there. They can get you the help you need.”

Excerpts:

Addis Standard: “What about the staff at the consulate in Beirut?”

Amb. Mohammed Berihu: “Come to the consulate during working hours. Have we ever denied anyone access to it? We have never done so.”

This appears untrue. Activists and domestic workers have shared experiences of being refused entry into the consulate or being kicked out by consular staff. One activist claims she was told to “never come back here,” by a consular official.

Last week, Lebanese broadcaster LBC aired footage of what appeared to be an Ethiopian woman left on the doorstep of the consulate after repeatedly being denied entrance. The woman, in tears, was interviewed by the LBC crew and explained that she was in legal limbo, undocumented and trying to get consular assistance to return home.

When this was pointed out to the ambassador, he too hung up the phone. The Ambassador refused to discuss specific cases, nor allegations that his office provides little more than a shipping and handling service in the case of Ethiopian deaths.

From death to delivery, Ethiopian and Lebanese hands work diligently to remove the package from the crime scene and send it to the obscurity of a graveyard in rural Ethiopia, where all haunting, incriminating secrets will be buried with it. It exonerates murderers and abusers in Lebanon and leaves family members in Ethiopia devastated and reeling from the lack of closure. And the cycle continues. It’ll never be long until the bilateral corpse disposal operation is mobilized again.

Over fifty.

That’s the number that Sara, the activist at This Is Lebanon gives on the deaths of Ethiopian domestic worker deaths in Lebanon this year alone. “The consulate refuses to release its own body count, but we have determined that the death toll has surpassed fifty. No one has been held accountable for these deaths.”

Sara boldly claims there is a correlation between the increase in Ethiopian domestic worker fatalities and the conduct of consular officials. “They are complicit and part of the problem,”is how she described the consular officials. “Most employers know that Ethiopian women are vulnerable and diplomatically unprotected. The consulate’s refusal to stand up for its own citizens is directly contributing to an increase in cases of deaths as well as physical and sexual abuse. Their incompetence is literally killing Ethiopian women.” Addis Standard cannot share her conclusions.

Desta Tafesse Bedane

Desta Tafesse Bedane was horribly scalded on both hands, the result of extreme torture, according to her sister Tigist.

Lebanese police appear unwilling to prosecute anyone suspected of migrant worker abuse, no matter how obvious her mistreatment was.

This picture of her bandaged hands was sent to her immediately afterwards. Images of her hands after the bandages were taken off were sent to us but are deemed far too graphic to be published.

Three days later, on May 12th this year, she was declared dead. The death was reported as a suicide. Despite being left with injuries that would appear to have rendered both of her hands useless, Lebanese police decided not to question her employer’s claim that she used her incapacitated hands to make a noose out of rope and hang herself. Desta worked seven days a week and had not been paid for 14 months.

“I didn’t even care about her being paid anymore, I just wanted her out of there alive,” her sister Tigist Tafesse says. “I still haven’t come to terms with my sister’s death.”

Emebet, the sister of Tigist Belay Tadesse, echoes similar sentiments. “As a family, our conscience won’t rest as we know there is no way Tigist would have killed herself. I won’t accept what they are telling us. I also know that God won’t let my sister’s murder go unpunished.”

In far too many cases, it does appear that divine authority is the only kind that the relatives of victims can call upon. In the scenario where the relevant authorities of two sovereign nations appear to be working against them, there is little else to look up to.

This article was originally published by the Addis Standard on July 25, 2019.

Envisioning the economy of the future: AFEP-IIPPE conference 2019

It's a sign of the times that academia is increasingly joining the movement to think seriously about capitalism and what might replace it. While in earlier periods of crisis many scholars thought it their role to engage in this way, during the 'Third Way' Blair/Clinton years of the 1990s and early 2000s – when I was a student – academic critique and visionary thinking about our economic system seemed to have faded, and it took the 2008 financial meltdown to re-energise those discussions.

This summer, around 700 academics, activists and artists came together at the University of Lille to discuss the biggest questions about our global economy. Organized jointly by two political economy associations – AFEP and IIPPE – the theme of the conference overlapped with ourEconomy's aim to promote new thinking about how to create economies that deliver a good life for everyone while respecting our ecological limits. The conference title: 'Envisioning the economy of the future and the future of political economy'.

I took the opportunity to interview participants, together with the founder and coordinator of IIPPE's activist and artist stream, Matthias Kispert.

We began by asking: 'What's the problem with our economy today?' Here's what they said:

As well as diagnosing and explaining the interlocking crises we face, we also wanted to think about the transformations needed to tackle the problems with our economy. So the next question we asked was: 'How do we fix our economy?'

Lastly, we asked participants about economics as a profession and academic discipline. The last 40 years of economic restructuring – which has seen the concentration of wealth in the hands of multinational corporations, spiraling inequality and ecological devastation – has been accompanied by the rise of certain theories and ideologies that have been indispensable in the rolling out of the neoliberal agenda. These economic theories that have dominated academia don't always have much to do with reality.

Thankfully, they are now being challenged by initiatives like Rethinking Economics and D-Econ as well as associations like IIPPE, AFEP and CPERN. We asked, in our final video: 'What's wrong with our economic theories and how can we fix them?'

We want to thank the organisers of the conference and all the participants who agreed to be in our videos. It's important to have these opportunities to get together to develop new visions for economies that work for people and planet.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

Woman by woman: crossing borders to strengthen rights in North Africa

This article is part of an editorial partnership with the Fund for Global Human Rights.

When Mariam Zemmouri was educating young rural women on their rights in Morocco, she did not realise the effect she was having until her trainees defended her in front of their local mayor.

“He tried to silence me. After I introduced myself, I was explaining what I taught as well as the purpose of our visit,” says Zemmouri, leader of Tawaza, a grassroots women’s association based in the northern coastal city of Martil. She had gone to the municipality of M’diq (a northern town close to Ceuta) with ten trainees to ask for street lighting to reduce the harassment young women endured on their way home after work. The mayor, however, kept asking Zemmouri to keep quite in the room.

“The girls surprised me when they spoke up in front of a dignitary they could never have imagined being in the same room with. They explained to him the significance of the training they had received with us because they were finally able to meet him and speak about their demands,” she adds.

Tawaza and other local organisations like it have their work cut out. Inequality between men and women is stark across North Africa: all countries in the region that were featured in the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index 2018 rank below the global average.

The good news is that the solutions to gender equality are crossing borders too. Grassroots women’s groups in Morocco and Tunisia, with the help of international allies, are exchanging their experiences about how best to train and support women in their communities.

Law and culture

On paper, women in Tunisia have had a lot of legal support to be happy about since 1956, when the constitution banned polygamy. Abortion was legalised in 1973. Over the years more laws in their favour have been passed, most recently lifting a ban on marrying non-Muslims. However, human rights critics say there are problems with putting the theory into practice.

Moroccan women received legal support much later, in2004, when the kingdom adopted a family code in support of women’s rights. A decade later, constitutional reforms gave women certain rights such as to divorce by mutual consent and the right to child custody. The law also raised the minimum age of marriage for women from 15 to 18. Last year, the country’s parliament passed a law that combats violence against women.

Echoing the concerns from Tunisia, Asmaa Falhi, programme officer for North Africa at The Fund for Global Human Rights, says: “We still have problems in the application.” Furthermore, there are lots of gaps in the recent Moroccan laws: for example, they do not outlaw marital rape or violence.

Added to constitutional problems, cultural ideologies are taking toll on the behaviour of rural and conservative areas across the Maghreb region. “Wahhabism [the ultra-conservative form of Islam based in Saudi Arabia] is returning into people’s lives,” says Halima Oulami, leader of Al Amane, an organisation based in Marrakesh, Morocco, whose name means ‘safety’ in Arabic. “This is taking us backwards, especially that Morocco now is led by a conservative party.”

Patriarchy combines with poverty to create widespread problems for North African women. According to Zemmouri, women outnumber men in farm work but have limited access to markets and incomes. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization says that men are generally the decision-makers in Moroccan farming communities. In the absence of the husband, male children frequently make decisions rather than their mother.

Women also suffer harassment and violence, especially when hard labour is the only means to earn bread, as is the situation of ‘cargo women’. Thousands of them cross the Moroccan borders every day towards the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla to transfer goods and face harassment, trafficking and similar problems.

Marriage at a very young age is common across the Maghreb: recent statistics indicate that more than 48,000 girls under the age of 18 in Morocco got married in 2014. This number represents a slight improvement (13% decrease) from 2004.

Different tools, one goal

These are the challenges that women’s organisations in Morocco and Tunisia face. One strength they have to deal with them is summed up in the meaning of the name Tawaza. This is a word in Tamazight – one of two official languages in Morocco – that means ‘cooperation to produce quality work within a short period of time’. Cooperation has allowed different grassroots organisations to share experiences and tactics with each other across North Africa and within their own countries, in order to reach their shared goals: to work with rural and marginalised women, and those who live in poor areas, to educate them on their legal rights, to help them become economically independent, and to train them to engage in their communities and to conduct their lives independently.

Some associations, like Al Amane, knocked on doors in impoverished neighbourhoods to invite people to workshops on civic engagement and legal rights. In one example, Al Amane offered families counselling and legal advice on child marriage, and argued that young girls should not be considered potential wives.

The association has also used theatrical performances to introduce rural communities to human rights principles. At its headquarters in one of the marginalised neighbourhoods of Marrakesh, it has also organised workshops to teach women new skills and help them find jobs.

Other associations have established listening centres to get closer to women’s problems. Tafoukt Souss – which means ‘the sun of the city of Souss’ in Tamazight – in mid-southern Morocco found that this method encouraged many women to come, unfold their problem and get psychological and legal advice. The idea was so successful that Moroccan women trained their Tunisian counterparts to repeat it in their own communities.

Borrowing the idea from their Moroccan counterparts, the Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights (FTDES) opened a listening centre in the city of Monastir to help women working in the textile industry there – who number more than 56,000 – combat violence.

Najoua Hadjamor, a former counsellor and listener at the centre, says: “Between 2014 and 2019 the Forum received 180 women who were victims of sexual, physical and economic violence. Benefitting from the Moroccan experience, we were able to offer women legal guidance on violence and inequality as well as psychological support for those abused and follow-up strategy.”

Another kind of knowledge-sharing worked in more direct way. The Fund for Global Human Rights supported Moroccan and Tunisian associations to form a ‘caravan’ – a group travelling together – across Tunisia. It transferred the Moroccan experience in empowering women to their Tunisian peers while also reaching rural communities in remote and marginalised areas and providing them legal and psychological support.

The caravan started on 2 May 2014 and visited the Tunisian cities of Monastir, Kairouan, Kasserine, Sidi Bou Zid, Sfax, Medenine and Al Rudayyif, ending its two-week journey on the eastern island of Djerba. Activists visited these communities to discuss and advocate for human and women’s rights in markets, schools, local associations and farms.

People from the communities participated actively in the workshops and engaged in conversations. The experience also made a difference to the associations themselves because they learned new tactics and strategies from each other as they travelled together from community to community.

The right sort of support

The grassroots women’s groups in Morocco and Tunisia would not have got where they are today without support from abroad. In Tunisia, particularly during the regime of the dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali (1989-2011), women's rights organisations could do little to work with individual communities to fight violence and gender discrimination. The few independent organisations based in the capital had to focus on challenging the dictatorship and fighting for their own survival. Since the 2011 revolution, however, they are able to focus on women’s empowerment and rights with a broader reach.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

Following the revolution, international organisations such as The Fund for Global Human Rights – which had been working in the region since 2004 – responded to the need of several small Tunisian women's rights groups. This support helped the grassroots organisations build and strengthen their constituencies, work closely with people in the ground and respond to the problems and needs that these women themselves identified.

Of course there is still much to do, and the non-governmental leaders interviewed for this article all underline the need for more funding to reach more people in more places. Extra resources “can help build a strong regional women’s rights movements”, says Asmaa Falhi from the Fund.

The women’s groups don’t want a blank cheque, though. They need technical help, such as training methods and techniques for working with rural women, to support further exchange and collaboration, building on the experience in listening centres and the activists’ caravan. Because the cultures and economies of Morocco and Tunisia are so similar, it is fruitful for grassroots organisations in the countries to share their struggles as well as their strategies and approaches, and to learn from each other’s successes and failures.

Another request is for more cooperation with women’s organisations in the western world. “Technically, I feel we are quite behind in some areas: in training methods, technology and field work. We need to learn more to improve what we can do,” says Halima Oulami, leader of Al Amane.

Signs of success

“Progress is hard to measure because we work on changing mentality,” says Oulami. However, associations that have been active for longer than a decade have noticed changes. Oulami, for example, has been able to help establish eighteen women’s groups in regions of Morocco that had not witnessed such activism before.

Another sign is the gradual emergence of women in the job sector. In conservative neighbourhoods, where women were not allowed to work, they are now to be seen working in stores – thanks to the economic empowerment workshops offered by women activists.

For Zahira Bouchait of Tafoukt Souss,“working with women on a daily basis and driving them to think critically in conservative areas is in itself a type of success for us”.

Zemmouri’s Tazawa, which manages a listening centre, is now being approached by police stations and the municipality to look after certain cases of abused women.

Many conservative communities are becoming open to women activists working in their areas. “Communities that did not welcome us at the beginning have now honoured us for changing women’s lives and for helping them start their own small businesses, or get a job in the argan farms [argan trees are cultivated for their oil], and counsel their peers to be better,” says Bouchait.

It’s work that takes sensitivity as well as a deep understanding of local cultures – something that only grassroots organisations can do, with the help of foreign allies prepared to listen to their needs.

What happens to trafficking survivors who won’t go to the police?

Lily arrived in Barcelona from Moldova in 2012, when she was only 23. Soon after, she reportedly told the Spanish police that she was a trafficking victim and requested assistance. But, when they asked her to name her traffickers, she recanted, seemingly afraid that the trafficking network would hurt her children if she gave them up.

Lily never attempted to make another police report. But she never stopped asking for help. For seven years, she explained her situation to anyone who would listen. Organisations, lawyers, social workers, elected officials, even her neighbours knew that Lily was being sexually exploited by traffickers.

But time and again, Lily was told that unless she reported her traffickers to the police, the system could not protect her. In early April 2019, her trafficker beat her so badly she ended up in the hospital. Once there, she was also diagnosed with leukaemia, though she died from those injuries.

Soon after, Laura Pérez, a Barcelona city councillor, with a brief covering international relations, feminisms and LGTBI rights, said that Lily’s death revealed “the gaps in a system that failed to protect her”. They were right. Cases like Lily’s show how not all trafficking victims are protected in Spain. Not all are able to turn in their traffickers, or may be afraid to.

Trafficking networks may threaten to harm children, families, or suspected informants themselves. Some people in these situations have not received information about their rights, or how to access them. They may not self-identify as victims of serious crimes and human rights abuses.

Even if they report their traffickers and cooperate with the police, the system does not eliminate their debts to these networks – or ensure that they can legally remain in Spain. When investigations are over, they may be deported and face retaliation in their home countries, from traffickers, for cooperating with the authorities – or they may be trafficked again.

But the Spanish system is not designed to protect these survivors’ human rights. Instead it is focused on combating trafficking networks.

The police are the only state agency that can officially identify someone as a trafficking victim in Spain. No other organisation, or social worker, has this power – despite their extensive expertise on these issues, and the fact that they often work closely with victims over extended periods of time.

And what happens to people before or after they report their traffickers to the police doesn’t seem to matter to the Spanish police. Their primary focus is to get women to cooperate with criminal investigations, despite the risks this can entail. If victims do not want to, or cannot, cooperate, they fall through the cracks and receive no protection from the system.

This matters because, when victims are not officially identified as such, they may end up facing charges for crimes that trafficking networks force them to commit. Or they may be sent to immigration detention centres and later deported. Or, like Lily, they may end up dead.

The only way this situation will change is if the protection system is redesigned with a human rights approach. The first step would be for the Spanish authorities to truly understand what human trafficking is – a complex phenomenon in which victims are not always free to report their traffickers. This, by no means, makes them any less worthy of protection.

Crime prosecution services can work with victims who report crimes. But Spain must provide protection for all survivors, whether or not they cooperate against the networks that targeted them. Only then will people stop becoming victims of a protection system that ignores their rights, preferring to look after its own interests (criminal convictions) instead.

Lily’s was not an isolated case. Rather it is a prime example of how our system is not working and how it can fail women who are in desperate need for support but can’t or won’t ‘collaborate’ with law enforcement.

Despite being aware of her situation as a victim of trafficking, Spanish authorities failed to protect Lily because she did not report her traffickers to the police. Her preventable death is a shocking reminder as to why such burdens cannot be placed on survivors of these crimes. It must teach us this lesson: anti-trafficking action needs to be human-rights centred.

Click Here: bape jacket cheap

Johnson’s strength is his divided opposition – is Labour brave enough to respond?

Poll bounce or no bounce, new Prime Minister Boris Johnson is unlikely to be keen on throwing his slim majority away on an almighty gamble – after all, his entire political career has been about this moment. But he may have no choice. So he’s got a twin-track strategy to stack up the odds of winning, if it comes to that.

First, to build the maximum momentum towards his ‘do or die’ 31st October Brexit deadline, which when thwarted he’ll entirely blame on a parliamentary elite in cahoots with their Brussels mates. Second, to ignore any usual customary costings and responsibility to implement in an almighty splurge of public spending commitments.

Together these can seriously wrongfoot the opposition and potentially hand Johnson the much increased majority he craves to secure his Premiership for the long-term.

Win some, lose some?

With the opposing parties fragmented and maintaining tribal loyalties, if Johnson fights an early general election as ‘the will of the people vs the parliamentary elite’ then the fallout in votes is pretty obvious. Assuming it’s ‘No Deal’ on offer, he’ll most likely get the boost he needs to win, reducing the Brexit Party to an insignificant rump in the process. He’ll lose some of the Cameron social-liberal Tory vote to the Lib-Dems but it’s quite doubtful much of that remains, given the Brexit trajectory of the Tories since the referendum.

Meanwhile Labour’s loss of voters to the Lib-Dems while unlikely to be on the scale of the Euro Elections will be significant enough to cost it seats and fail to gain some targets. In Scotland, with absolutely no sign of a Labour recovery, Labour gaining its 18 target Scottish target seats looks like a forlorn ambition. It is more likely to lose seats, 4 of which have majorities under 1000. With the Tories’ Scottish seats vulnerable too, the SNP is likely to emerge not far short of its 2015 landslide.

The Greens? The harsh truth is that despite any surge, they remain no closer to winning anywhere other in than Caroline Lucas’s Brighton seat than they have ever been.

Tactical campaigning, not tactical voting

Our first past the post system is spectacularly ill-equipped to deal with the emerging fragmentation of voter loyalties, and to steer their way to victory the opposition parties need to face up to the implications of this and fast.

Perhaps in a handful of seats the Greens may stand down, though their experience in 2017 where they got nothing in return means it is less likely this time round. There will be various tactical voting initiatives, but these will be almost entirely lost once the whole furore of a General Election campaign kicks in.

A smarter move is tactical campaigning. Labour has 66 target seats and a further 19 with sub-1000 majorities it has to defend. Win / save the lot, and it has an overall majority, but right now that seems a long shot. Brexit has changed the dynamic in too many of those seats, and the list is too broad now. Tactical campaigning is the recognition that while some of those seats remain winnable, or saveable, others aren’t – forget them, and use your campaigning resources accordingly, without exception. Brutal, but to win Labour is going to have to be every bit as ruthless as Johnson. In particular Momentum’s brilliant 2017 online tool ‘My nearest Marginal’ campaign tool needs to be recalculated, to focus on where Labour can now best win, sending tens of thousands of campaigners to those seats

Labour also needs to renew its focus on first time voters – and another huge voter registration drive – as these factors undoubtedly contributed to its 2017 result. These are the voters for whom Johnson is part of the establishment in a way Corbyn never has been, and still isn’t.

The big offer – and the Corbyn factor

But first-time (and second-time) voters, whilst they should shape Labour’s campaign, won’t be nearly enough on their own. Nor will Labour’s core vote. Any party, including Corbyn’s Labour, has to reach out. This is where the ‘hardness’ of the hard left tradition Corbyn comes from, is in danger of getting things so very wrong.

It’s tough, of course. At the moment, tribal point-scoring prevails on most sides, Plaid Cymru and the Greens sensibly standing down in favour of the Lib-Dems in the by-election in Brecon and Radnorshire, where they were never going to win, is very much the exception.

Much more typical was Jo Swinson launching her leadership by declaring Corbyn a Brexiteer – but this statement defies logic, given that her party’s MPs have marched through the lobbies with Labour to defeat May’s deal, time and time again. Labour’s position isn’t as ‘pro-Remain’ as the Liberal Democrats but it’s never been pro- Tory Brexit either. Bringing an early end to May’s premiership proves that, and if the opposition to Johnson is to be maximised there has to be a degree of recognition of this.

The same can be said of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens, for their own short-term interests each treating Labour, or more specifically Jeremy Corbyn, as every bit as much of a problem as the Tories. Where does that get us?

But Labour’s response is a problem too. Heaping all her track record as part of the Con-Dem coalition of Cameron and Clegg on to Jo Swinson just drives away left-leaning voters who flirt with voting Lib Dem every now and then. During the Blair years, for some left-leaning voters to vote Lib Dem was to vote against the Iraq War, now for many it is to vote against Brexit. The Greens attract left leaning pro-remain votes from those who still can’t quite stomach voting Lib-Dem, as well as those to whom green issues appeal and politics as usual doesn’t. And the same goes for the appeal of the SNP, with their increased votes as much about recording Scottish opposition to Brexit as necessarily for independence. Labour insults the intelligence of all these voters the party has lost since 2017 at its electoral peril.

So for Labour to reach out needs three key elements.

First, a vote for Labour is against No Deal, for a referendum on any deal.

Second, it should be for the Scottish Parliament to decide on having an independence referendum, not Westminster.

Third, this will be a Climate Emergency government.

The first and the second won’t satisfy everyone in Labour’s own ranks. The third goes against some trade unions’ sectional defence of airport expansion, nuclear power and fracking. Tough. This is a programme to win the broadest possible support for Labour that doesn’t soften its radical appeal, not one bit. Triangulation from the Left.

The magic of the money tree

Such a broad appeal is the only way to stand any kind of chance in the face of the Tories twin track campaign – against the ‘parliamentary elite’ and for a huge public spending programme. Neither may wash, but that doesn’t mean they won’t work, as countless defeats of the Left should be enough to tell us.

A race to outbid Johnson on his ever-increasing spending plans is dubious politics. Rather the message should be about who spends the money and how. The superlative Angela Rayner on education shows the way – the party that rolled out much-hated academies, versus the party that would abolish them to return our schools to their communities, teachers and parents to run. and Labour needs to ensure this becomes the narrative across the board. Labour should steer the debate away from the ever-spiralling amounts of money Johnson pledges to spend, and towards the party of failed privatisation vs the party of improved public service. If it can’t this is potentially where Labour is most vulnerable.

Getting Boris wrong

‘Maggie, Maggie, Maggie. Out! Out! Out!’ didn’t get rid of her or John Major for the best part of two decades. And neither will Fck Boris. This is feel-good politics masquerading as resistance. Nor is the liberal left version very much better, focusing on the Eton-educated bad boys using dodgy Facebook ads to win votes. Yes, we know all that, it makes us feel good telling ourselves so – but it didn’t stop the country voting Leave, and similar strategies haven’t dented Trumps chances across the Atlantic either.

A Coalition of Chaos?

Since the 2015 General Election, the spectre of those Tory posters of Ed Miliband in Alex Salmond’s pocket, ‘the coalition of chaos’ has haunted Labour. But when May invited the DUP into Number Ten she replaced the coalition of chaos with the coalition from hell. Game on.

Of course, Labour is never going to campaign for a coalition government – they fight to win an overall majority. But fighting to win is very different to ruling out the possibility that such a result may not be delivered by voters.

What does Labour achieve by ruling out refusing to discuss, the possibility of coalition? Nothing. Instead it has plenty to gain by entertaining the idea, if required, in the national interest if that is what the voters demand. And the same of course goes for the rest of the opposition parties. With Johnson’s No Deal centre stage, on what possible basis could they consider a coalition with him, and if not with the Tories, with whom?

Meanwhile, even to reach the stage where a Labour-led coalition is possible, Labour has to win the most seats – which focuses minds over the ballot paper, doesn't it?

Can Labour win?

Who knows? The kamikaze Labour centre-right are convinced it can’t under Corbyn and aren’t exactly backward at saying so. Many of Jeremy’s most vocally critical MPs are sitting on hugely increased 2017 majorities, due less (whatever they may like to think) to the candidate’s personal qualities, as to the popular appeal of the For the Many Not the Few manifesto.

But painful as it might be to point out, that manifesto didn’t actually win the election for Labour last time. And this time Labour face Johnson and Swinson, infinitely better campaigners than May and Farron. If Labour fights 2019 (or whenever it might come) on the terrain of 2017 it will surely lose, and badly. This is little or nothing to do with Jeremy Corbyn, it’s the party’s strategy that matters, and Corbyn is as capable of representing the shifts I set out above – on the environment, on Scottish independence, and on Brexit – as anyone. Indeed Corbyn making them will have immeasurably more impact than coming from someone else, least of all his dogged critics. The terrain isn’t of Labour’s choosing, but it is the basis on which it can win – in all probability not on its own but with other parties too. With such shifts, everything becomes possible. Such is what dreams are made of.

Click Here: bape jacket cheap

Trump lied about being among the 9/11 first-responders, so people are Photoshopping him into historical events

The president seems to abhor anyone taking the spotlight from himself. At a ceremony at the White House Rose Garden on Monday where he signed a bill granting permanent compensation to 9/11 first-responders, he included himself among the heroes. 

“I was down there also, but I’m not considering myself a first-responder,” Trump told the 9/11 first-responders, many of whom lost colleagues in the attacks. “But I was down there. I spent a lot of time down there with you.”

However, like most things Trump says, it wasn’t true.

Click Here: Arsenal FC Jerseys

“I spent many months there myself, and I never witnessed him,” Richard Alles, a retired deputy chief with the New York Fire Department, told The New York Times. “He was a private citizen at the time. I don’t know what kind of role he could have possibly played.”

Video footage shows that shortly after the World Trade Center buildings fell, he bragged that he now owned the tallest building in downtown Manhattan. Which wasn’t true. 

“40 Wall Street actually was the second-tallest building in downtown Manhattan and it was actually, before the World Trade Center, was the tallest — and then, when they built the World Trade Center, it became known as the second-tallest,” Trump said. “And now it’s the tallest.”

Trump’s claim that he was among the first-responders has drawn criticism and spawned tons of memes under #LostTrumpHistory. People on social media are mocking his penchant for lying and stealing others’ thunder by Photoshopping him into historical events such as the moon landing, Washington crossing the Delaware, and The Last Supper.

Here are some of the best responses to #LostTrumpHistory.